Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39021776›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Understanding the roles of economy and society in the relative risks of zoonosis emergence from livestock.

Stephen Hinchliffe, Alex Blanchette, Kin Wing Ray Chan, Chris Degeling, Jody Emel, Melissa Leach, Ian Scoones, Michael Winter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephen HinchliffeGeography University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0698-8924
Alex BlanchetteAnthropology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.
Kin Wing Ray ChanAgricultural Science and Practice, Royal Agricultural University, Cirencester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7729-6098
Chris DegelingSchool of Health and Society, University of Wollongong Faculty of the Arts Social Sciences and Humanities, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4279-3443
Jody EmelGeography, Clark University Graduate School of Geography, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Melissa LeachAnthropology, Cambridge Conservation Initiative, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1293-6848
Ian ScoonesInstitute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8547-4464
Michael WinterCentre for Rural Policy Research (CRPR), University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0186-0139

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of zoonotic infections that can develop into pathogens of pandemic potential is a major concern for public health. The risks of emergence and transmission relate to multiple factors that range from land use to human-non-human animal contacts. Livestock agriculture plays a potentially significant role in those risks, shaping landscapes and providing hosts that can act as the source or amplifiers of emergent pathogens. The relative risks will be contingent upon the nature of those systems, with comparisons often made between intensive, indoor, biosecure systems and more extensive, outdoor, insecure systems. Microbiological, ecological and veterinary sciences provide useful entry points in specifying and modelling some of the relative risks. Yet, they often do so with little regard for social science inputs and by making assumptions about social and economic conditions. In this article, we respond to recent analyses of relative risks by raising the importance of social and economic drivers of risk. We chart social science insights and research that materially alter the zoonotic risks associated with livestock production. Our purpose is to emphasize the requirement for full appreciation of the social, economic and political components of zoonotic and pandemic risk.

Indexed as

agriculturepandemicsrisksocial science

Identifiers

PMID39021776
PMCPMC11251772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.