Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39021678›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP

Understanding sexual distress related to sexual function (SDRSF): A preliminary framework based on a qualitative study with clinical sexologists.

Catarina F Raposo, Pedro J Nobre, Andreia A Manão, Patrícia M Pascoal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06823973 (Anthesis - A Transdiagnostic Approach to Sexual Distress), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06823973 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Anthesis - A Transdiagnostic Approach to Sexual Distress: Testing a Pilot Online Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorGrupo LusófonaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsSexual Distress, Sexual DysfunctionsArmsCBT-based transdiagnostic approach to sexual distress, Waiting list condition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catarina F RaposoCenter for Psychology at the University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the University of Porto, Portugal.
Pedro J NobreCenter for Psychology at the University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the University of Porto, Portugal.
Andreia A ManãoLusófona University, HEI-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Labs, Portugal.
Patrícia M PascoalLusófona University, HEI-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Labs, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sexual distress related to sexual function (SDRSF) is pivotal in diagnosing sexual dysfunction. However, there is a lack of theoretical models for its comprehension and of knowledge concerning how to address it in clinical practice. Aim: To contribute to theory building and clinical practice about SDRSF by collecting clinicians' accounts, aiming to inform a preliminary framework to study and intervene in SDRSF. Method: Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data from 16 semi-structured interviews with clinical sexologists. Conclusion: These insights frame a comprehensive conceptualization of SDRSF in clinical settings that goes beyond sexual activity and implies that interpersonal and societal factors need to be considered in research and intervention in this field.

Indexed as

Clinical sexologistsPreliminary frameworkReflexive thematic analysisSexual distressSexual function

Identifiers

PMID39021678
PMCPMC467054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.