Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39021523›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2024

Evaluating antiarrhythmic drugs for managing infants with supraventricular tachycardia; a review.

Azad Mojahedi, Afsaneh Mirshekari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Practical compendium of antiarrhythmic drugs: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Azad MojahediDepartment of Internal Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital Stony Brook, New York, The United States.
Afsaneh MirshekariDepartment of Pediatrics, Zabol University of Medical Sciences Zabol, Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is the most prevalent arrhythmia observed in infants, impacting individuals with or without congenital cardiac dysfunction. Infantile-onset SVT typically manifests within the initial one to two months of life. A variety of anti-arrhythmic medications are employed to treat SVT in infants during their first year of life. Nevertheless, a consensus has yet to be reached on the most efficacious drug, and treatment approaches continue to vary considerably As SVT remains a frequent problem around the world, with different management approaches and no obvious optimal option, we conducted a systematic review of the new update of antiarrhythmic drugs for managing SVT in infants under one year old.

Indexed as

Antiarrhythmicinfantssupraventricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID39021523
PMCPMC11249662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.