Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39021378›Full record

ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada2024

Efficacy, effectiveness and immunogenicity of reduced HPV vaccination schedules: A review of available evidence.

Joshua Montroy, Marina I Salvadori, Nicole Forbes, Vinita Dubey, Sarah Almasri, Anna Jirovec, Cathy Yan, Katarina Gusic, Adrienne Stevens, Kelsey Young and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. FIGO position statement on the effectiveness and safety of the HPV vaccine.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Statement: Updated guidance on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joshua MontroyCentre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Marina I SalvadoriCentre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Nicole ForbesCentre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Vinita DubeyToronto Public Health and University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON.
Sarah AlmasriCentre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Anna JirovecCentre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Cathy YanCentre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Katarina GusicCentre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Adrienne StevensCentre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Kelsey YoungCentre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Matthew TunisCentre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) guidance recommends human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines be administered as a two or three-dose schedule. Recently, several large clinical trials have reported the clinical benefit of a single HPV vaccine dose. As a result, the World Health Organization released updated guidance on HPV vaccines in 2022, recommending a two-dose schedule for individuals aged 9-20 years, and acknowledging the use of an alternative off-label single dose schedule. Objective: The objective of this overview is to provide a detailed account of the available evidence comparing HPV vaccination schedules, which was considered by NACI when updating recommendations on HPV vaccines. Methods: To identify relevant evidence, existing systematic reviews were leveraged where possible. Individual studies were critically appraised, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: Available evidence suggests that a one, two, or three-dose HPV vaccine schedule may provide similar protection from HPV infection. While antibody levels against HPV vaccine types were statistically significantly lower with a single dose schedule compared to two or three doses, titres were sustained for up to 16 years. The clinical significance of lower antibody titres is unknown, as there is no established immunologic correlate of protection. Conclusion: While the available evidence on single-dose HPV vaccination schedules shows a one-dose schedule is highly effective, continued follow-up of single-dose cohorts will be critical to understanding the relative duration of protection for reduced dose schedules and informing future NACI guidance on HPV vaccines.

Indexed as

cancerdose-reductiondosing scheduleeffectivenessevidence reviewHPVvaccination

Identifiers

PMID39021378
PMCPMC11251446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.