Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39021214›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2025

Risk of infections in multiple myeloma. A populationbased study on 8,672 multiple myeloma patients diagnosed 2008-2021 from the Swedish Myeloma Registry.

Cecilie Hveding Blimark, Kristina Carlson, Christopher Day, Sigrun Einarsdottir, Gunnar Juliusson, Moshtak Karma, Dorota Knut-Bojanowska, Gunnar Larfors, Ingemar Turesson, Mariana Villegas-Scivetti and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perioperative considerations for patients with multiple myeloma.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cecilie Hveding BlimarkSahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg. cecilie.blimark@vgregion.se.
Kristina CarlsonUppsala University Hospital, Uppsala.
Christopher DaySahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg.
Sigrun EinarsdottirSahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg.
Gunnar JuliussonLund University and Department of Hematology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund.
Moshtak KarmaSödra Älvsborg Hospital, Borås.
Dorota Knut-BojanowskaUddevalla Hospital, Uddevalla, Sweden; Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg.
Gunnar LarforsUppsala University Hospital, Uppsala.
Ingemar TuressonDepartment of Hematology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö.
Mariana Villegas-ScivettiSahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg.
Ingigerdur SverrisdóttirSahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In multiple myeloma (MM), advancements in treatments and toxicity management have enhanced survival rates. This, coupled with shifting age demographics in MM, necessitates an updated assessment of infection risks in MM patients compared to the general population. Using Swedish population-based registries, we investigated the incidence of infections in 8,672 Swedish symptomatic MM patients diagnosed 2008-2021 and 34,561 matched controls. Overall, MM patients had a 5-fold risk (hazard ratio [HR] =5.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.14-5.47) of developing a clinically significant infection compared to matched controls. Bacterial infections represented a 5-fold (HR=4.88; 95% CI: 4.70-5.07) increased risk, viral and fungal infections 7-fold compared to controls. The first year after MM diagnosis the risk of infections compared to controls was 7-fold (HR=6.95; 95% CI: 6.61-7.30) and remained elevated up to 5 years after the myeloma diagnosis. The risk of infection compared to controls remained 5-fold in MM patients with follow-up till 2022. Preceding MM diagnosis, the risk compared to matched controls was significantly increased up to 4 years before MM diagnosis (HR=1.16; 95% CI: 1.05-1.28). Among MM patients, 8% had died within 2 months of diagnosis and infection contributed to 32% of all deaths. After 1 year, 20% MM patients had died, and infection-related mortality was 27%. Our data constitute the largest population-based study to date on the risk of infections compared to the normal population in the era of modern MM therapies and confirms that infections still represent a major threat to patients and underscores importance of preventive strategies.

Indexed as

InfectionsMultiple MyelomaRegistriesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceRisk FactorsSweden

Identifiers

PMID39021214
PMCPMC11694133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.