Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39021064›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2024

Significance of androgen-deprivation therapy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer treated with high-dose radiotherapy: A literature review.

Rihito Aizawa, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Manabu Kato, Shosei Shimizu, Takashi Mizowaki, Yasuo Kohjimoto, Shiro Hinotsu, Isao Hara, working group of the Japanese Urological Association Clinical Practice Guideline for Prostate Cancer 2023

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rihito AizawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7098-6221
Hitoshi IshikawaQST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0046-9787
Manabu KatoDepartment of Urology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Shosei ShimizuDepartment of Pediatric Radiation Therapy Center/Pediatric Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hebei Yizhou Cancer Hospital, Zhuozhou City, China.
Takashi MizowakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-8746
Yasuo KohjimotoDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Shiro HinotsuBiostatistics and Data Management, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Isao HaraDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4542-4045
working group of the Japanese Urological Association Clinical Practice Guideline for Prostate Cancer 2023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The real-world benefits of adding androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and its optimal duration when combined with current standard high-dose radiation therapy (RT) remain unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy of and toxicities associated with ADT in the setting of combination with high-dose RT for intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa). This article is a modified and detailed version of the commentary on Clinical Question 8 described in the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prostate Cancer (ver. 2023). A qualitative systematic review was performed according to the Minds Guide. All relevant published studies between September 2010 and August 2020, which assessed the outcomes of IR or HR PCa treated with high-dose RT, were screened using two databases (PubMed and ICHUSHI). A total of 41 studies were included in this systematic review, mostly consisting of retrospective studies (N = 34). The evidence basically supports the benefit of adding ADT to high-dose RT to improve tumor control. Regarding IR populations, many studies suggested the existence of a subgroup for which adding ADT had no impact on either overall survival or the BF-free duration. On the other hand, regarding HR populations, several studies suggested the positive impact of adding ADT for ≥1 year on overall survival. Adding ADT increases not only the risk of sexual dysfunction but also that of cardiovascular toxicities or bone fracture. Although the benefit of adding ADT was basically suggested for both IR and HR populations, further investigations are warranted to identify subgroups of patients for whom ADT has no benefit, as well as the appropriate duration of ADT for those who do derive benefit.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleRadiotherapy DosageAndrogen Antagonistsandrogen‐deprivation therapyhigh‐dose radiotherapyhigh‐riskintermediate‐riskprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID39021064
PMCPMC11524132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.