Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39020956›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E2024

Physical limits to acceleration of enzymatic reactions inside phase-separated compartments.

Jeremy D Schmit, Thomas C T Michaels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Delay-facilitated self-assembly in compartmentalized systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeremy D SchmitDepartment of Physics, <a href="https://ror.org/05p1j8758">Kansas State University</a>, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, United States.
Thomas C T MichaelsDepartment of Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, <a href="https://ror.org/05a28rw58">ETH Zurich</a>, Otto Stern Weg 3, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Structure-function properties in liquid organellesR01GM141235 · NIGMS · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMIT, JEREMY DAVID · 2021 to 2024
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a theoretical analysis of phase-separated compartments to facilitate enzymatic chemical reactions. While phase separation can facilitate reactions by increasing local concentration, it can also hinder the mobility of reactants. In particular, we find that the attractive interactions that concentrate reactants within the dense phase can inhibit reactions by lowering the mobility of the reactants. This mobility loss severely limits the potential to enhance reaction rates. Phase separation provides greater benefit in situations where multiple sequential reactions occur and/or high order reactions, provided the enzymes are unsaturated, transport to the condensate is not limiting, and the reactants are mobile. We show that mobility can be maintained if recruitment to the condensed phase is driven by multiple attractive moieties that can bind and release independently. However, the spacers necessary to ensure independence between stickers are prone to entangle with the dense phase scaffold. We find an optimal sticker affinity that balances the need for rapid binding/unbinding kinetics and minimal entanglement. Reaction rates can be accelerated by shrinking the size of the dense phase with a corresponding increase in the number of stickers. Our results showcase the potential capabilities of phase-separated compartments to act as biochemical reaction crucibles within living cells.

Indexed as

EnzymesKineticsModels, BiologicalModels, ChemicalEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID39020956
PMCPMC12943787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.