ArticlePhysical review. E2024
Physical limits to acceleration of enzymatic reactions inside phase-separated compartments.
Article in Physical review. E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delay-facilitated self-assembly in compartmentalized systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Sticky enzymes: increased metabolic efficiency via substrate-dependent enzyme clustering.PRX life · 2025Article
- Computer Simulations Show That Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation Enhances Self-Assembly.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Self-assembly coupled to liquid-liquid phase separation.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a theoretical analysis of phase-separated compartments to facilitate enzymatic chemical reactions. While phase separation can facilitate reactions by increasing local concentration, it can also hinder the mobility of reactants. In particular, we find that the attractive interactions that concentrate reactants within the dense phase can inhibit reactions by lowering the mobility of the reactants. This mobility loss severely limits the potential to enhance reaction rates. Phase separation provides greater benefit in situations where multiple sequential reactions occur and/or high order reactions, provided the enzymes are unsaturated, transport to the condensate is not limiting, and the reactants are mobile. We show that mobility can be maintained if recruitment to the condensed phase is driven by multiple attractive moieties that can bind and release independently. However, the spacers necessary to ensure independence between stickers are prone to entangle with the dense phase scaffold. We find an optimal sticker affinity that balances the need for rapid binding/unbinding kinetics and minimal entanglement. Reaction rates can be accelerated by shrinking the size of the dense phase with a corresponding increase in the number of stickers. Our results showcase the potential capabilities of phase-separated compartments to act as biochemical reaction crucibles within living cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.