ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2024
Separate hydrolysis and fermentation of softwood bark pretreated with 2-naphthol by steam explosion.
Article in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background2-Naphthol, a carbocation scavenger, is known to mitigate lignin condensation during the acidic processing of lignocellulosic biomass, which may benefit downstream processing of the resulting materials. Consequently, various raw materials have demonstrated improved enzymatic saccharification yields for substrates pretreated through autohydrolysis and dilute acid hydrolysis in the presence of 2-naphthol. However, 2-naphthol is toxic to ethanol-producing organisms, which may hinder its potential application. Little is known about the implications of 2-naphthol in combination with the pretreatment of softwood bark during continuous steam explosion in an industrially scalable system.
resultsThe 2-naphthol-pretreated softwood bark was examined through spectroscopic techniques and subjected to separate hydrolysis and fermentation along with a reference excluding the scavenger and a detoxified sample washed with ethanol. The extractions of the pretreated materials with water resulted in a lower aromatic content in the extracts and stronger FTIR signals, possibly related to guaiacyl lignin, in the nonextractable residue when 2-naphthol was used during pretreatment. In addition, cyclohexane/acetone (9:1) extraction revealed the presence of pristine 2-naphthol in the extracts and increased aromatic content of the nonextractable residue detectable by NMR for the scavenger-pretreated materials. Whole-slurry enzymatic saccharification at 12% solids loading revealed that elevated saccharification recoveries after 48 h could not be achieved with the help of the scavenger. Glucose concentrations of 16.9 (reference) and 15.8 g/l (2-naphthol) could be obtained after 48 h of hydrolysis. However, increased inhibition during fermentation of the scavenger-pretreated hydrolysate, indicated by yeast cell growth, was slight and could be entirely overcome by the detoxification stage. The ethanol yields from fermentable sugars after 24 h were 0.45 (reference), 0.45 (2-naphthol), and 0.49 g/g (2-naphthol, detoxified).
conclusionThe carbocation scavenger 2-naphthol did not increase the saccharification yield of softwood bark pretreated in an industrially scalable system for continuous steam explosion. On the other hand, it was shown that the scavenger's inhibitory effects on fermenting microorganisms can be overcome by controlling the pretreatment conditions to avoid cross-inhibition or detoxifying the substrates through ethanol washing. This study underlines the need to jointly optimize all the main processing steps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.