ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024
Prioritising deteriorating patients using time-to-event analysis: prediction model development and internal-external validation.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of Real-Time Automated Clinical Deterioration Alert and Trigger Systems on Clinical Outcomes in Adult General Ward Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical care medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Comment on "Lean body mass index and hypertension risk in men: a nationwide epidemiological cohort study".Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Association of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure with the Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease in Older Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients without Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Study (Diabetes Metab J 2025;49:1308-17).Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2026Article
- Prediction of Adverse Events in Single Ventricle Physiology Infants Using Artificial Intelligence Tools.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Comment on "Prognostic Value of Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction".Journal of clinical practice and research · 2026Article
- Observational
- Smart emergency care: a narrative review of predictive machine learning models.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Effects of Zibotentan and Dapagliflozin on Fluid Retention in Patients with CKD: Need More Evidence.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025Article
- Methodological Considerations Regarding the Article "Association Between Non-Benzodiazepine Hypnotics and Tinnitus: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan" [Letter].Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
- Predicting nosocomial infections in critically Ill children: a comprehensive systematic review of risk assessment models.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Comment on 'Change in Physical Activity and Its Association With Decline in Kidney Function: A UK Biobank-Based Cohort Study' by Liu et al.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Article
- Association of Uterine Leiomyoma with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Young Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study (Diabetes Metab J 2024;48:1105-13).Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2024Article
- Limitations of the cox proportional hazards model and alternative approaches in metachronous recurrence research.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBinary classification models are frequently used to predict clinical deterioration, however they ignore information on the timing of events. An alternative is to apply time-to-event models, augmenting clinical workflows by ranking patients by predicted risks. This study examines how and why time-to-event modelling of vital signs data can help prioritise deterioration assessments using lift curves, and develops a prediction model to stratify acute care inpatients by risk of clinical deterioration.
methodsWe developed and validated a Cox regression for time to in-hospital mortality. The model used time-varying covariates to estimate the risk of clinical deterioration. Adult inpatient medical records from 5 Australian hospitals between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020 were used for model development and validation. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed using internal-external cross validation. A discrete-time logistic regression model predicting death within 24 h with the same covariates was used as a comparator to the Cox regression model to estimate differences in predictive performance between the binary and time-to-event outcome modelling approaches.
resultsOur data contained 150,342 admissions and 1016 deaths. Model discrimination was higher for Cox regression than for discrete-time logistic regression, with cross-validated AUCs of 0.96 and 0.93, respectively, for mortality predictions within 24 h, declining to 0.93 and 0.88, respectively, for mortality predictions within 1 week. Calibration plots showed that calibration varied by hospital, but this can be mitigated by ranking patients by predicted risks.
conclusionTime-varying covariate Cox models can be powerful tools for triaging patients, which may lead to more efficient and effective care in time-poor environments when the times between observations are highly variable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.