Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39020412›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024

Siloed mentality, health system suboptimization and the healthcare symphony: a Canadian perspective.

Robin S Lau, Mari E Boesen, Lawrence Richer, Michael D Hill

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A call for upstream solutions to the unregulated drug crisis in British Columbia, Canada: Locked up or locked out.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robin S LauAlberta Innovates, #1500, 10104 103 Ave NW, Edmonton, AB, T5J 0H8, Canada. robin.lau@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-9449
Mari E BoesenCalgary Centre for Clinical Research (CCCR), University of Calgary, 400, Cal Wenzel Precision Health, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Lawrence RicherFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 3-372, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Michael D HillCalgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Health Sciences Centre, University of Calgary, RM 2939, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research 2273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring and optimizing a health system is challenging when patient care is split between many independent organizations. For example, patients receive care from their primary care provider, outpatient specialist clinics, hospitals, private providers and, in some instances, family members. These silos are maintained through different funding sources (or lack of funding) which incentivize siloed service delivery. A shift towards prioritizing patient outcomes and keeping the patient at the centre of care is emerging. However, competing philosophies on patient needs, how health is defined and how health is produced and funded is creating and engraining silos in the delivery of health services. Healthcare and health outcomes are produced through a series of activities conducted by diverse teams of health professionals working in concert. Health professionals are continually learning from each patient interaction; however, silos are barriers to information exchange, collaborative evidence generation and health system improvement. This paper presents a systems view of healthcare and provides a systems lens to approach current challenges in health systems. The first part of the paper provides a background on the current state and challenges to healthcare in Canada. The second part presents potential reasons for continued health system underperformance. The paper concludes with a system perspective for addressing these challenges.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareCanadaHealth PersonnelHumansPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareComplex adaptive systemsContinuous improvementHealthcareHealth services and policy researchLearning health systemsOrganizational culturePatient outcomesQuality improvementSituated learning

Identifiers

PMID39020412
PMCPMC11253392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.