ArticleThrombosis journal2024
Antithrombotic therapy at discharge and prognosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation who underwent PCI: a real-world study.
Article in Thrombosis journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Antithrombotic Management of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
- The impact of atrial fibrillation type on clinical outcomes and antithrombotic therapy at discharge in patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a real-world study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to describe the status of antithrombotic therapy at discharge and prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
methodsThis was an observational, prospective study. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attach (TIA), systemic embolism or ischemia-driven revascularization. Bleeding events were collected according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria.
resultsBetween 2017 and 2019, a cohort of 516 patients (mean age 66, [SD 9], of whom 18.4% were female) with AF and CCS who underwent PCI were evaluated, with a median followed-up time of 36 months (Interquartile range: 22-45). MACE events occurred in 13.0% of the patients, while the TIMI bleeding events were observed in 17.4%. Utilization of TAT (triple antithrombotic therapy) (P < 0.001) and oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy (P < 0.001) increased through years. History of heart failure (HF) (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.744; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.011-3.038) and TAT (HR, 2.708; 95%CI, 1.653-4.436) had independent associations with MACE events. OAC (HR, 10.378; 95%CI, 6.136-17.555) was identified as a risk factor for bleeding events. A higher creatine clearance (HR, 0.986; 95%CI, 0.974-0.997) was associated with a lower incidence of bleeding events.
conclusionsAntithrombotic therapy has been improved among patients with AF and CCS who underwent PCI these years. History of HF and TAT were independently associated with MACE events. Higher creatine clearance was protective factor of bleeding events, while OAC was a risk factor for TIMI bleeding events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.