Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39020392›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2024

Livestock keeping, mosquitoes and community viewpoints: a mixed methods assessment of relationships between livestock management, malaria vector biting risk and community perspectives in rural Tanzania.

Yohana A Mwalugelo, Winifrida P Mponzi, Letus L Muyaga, Herieth H Mahenge, Godfrey C Katusi, Faith Muhonja, Dickens Omondi, Alfred O Ochieng, Emmanuel W Kaindoa, Fred A Amimo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Temporal Variation and Human Host Predominance inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Serological evidence of continued exposure toFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yohana A MwalugeloEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania. ymwalugelo@ihi.or.tz.
Winifrida P MponziEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Letus L MuyagaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Herieth H MahengeEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Godfrey C KatusiEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Faith MuhonjaSchool of Public Health, Amref International University, P.O. Box 27691-00506, Nairobi, Kenya.
Dickens OmondiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 210, Bondo, 40601, Kenya.
Alfred O Ochieng *Department of Biological Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 210, Bondo, 40601, Kenya.
Emmanuel W Kaindoa *Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Fred A Amimo *Department of Biomedical Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 210, Bondo, 40601, Kenya.

Funding

Capacity Development of Applied Epidemiologists in Eastern Africa Region (CDAE) CSA2020E-3139Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA) G-19-57145NIHR-Wellcome Trust Partnership for Global Health Research International Training Fellowship 216448/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLivestock keeping is one of the potential factors related to malaria transmission. To date, the impact of livestock keeping on malaria transmission remains inconclusive, as some studies suggest a zooprophylactic effect while others indicate a zoopotentiation effect. This study assessed the impact of livestock management on malaria transmission risks in rural Tanzania. Additionally, the study explored the knowledge and perceptions of residents about the relationships between livestock keeping and malaria transmission risks in a selected village.

methodsIn a longitudinal entomological study in Minepa village, South Eastern Tanzania, 40 households were randomly selected (20 with livestock, 20 without). Weekly mosquito collection was performed from January to April 2023. Indoor and outdoor collections used CDC-Light traps, Prokopack aspirators, human-baited double-net traps, and resting buckets. A subsample of mosquitoes was analysed using PCR and ELISA for mosquito species identification and blood meal detection. Livestock's impact on mosquito density was assessed using negative binomial GLMMs. Additionally, in-depth interviews explored community knowledge and perceptions of the relationship between livestock keeping and malaria transmission risks.

resultsA total of 48,677 female Anopheles mosquitoes were collected. Out of these, 89% were Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) while other species were Anopheles funestus s.l., Anopheles pharoensis, Anopheles coustani, and Anopheles squamosus. The findings revealed a statistically significant increase in the overall number of An. gambiae s.l. outdoors (RR = 1.181, 95%CI 1.050-1.862, p = 0.043). Also, there was an increase of the mean number of An. funestus s.l. mosquitoes collected in households with livestock indoors (RR = 2.866, 95%CI: 1.471-5.582, p = 0.002) and outdoors (RR = 1.579,95%CI 1.080-2.865, p = 0.023). The human blood index of Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes from houses with livestock was less than those without livestock (OR = 0.149, 95%CI 0.110-0.178, p < 0.001). The majority of participants in the in-depth interviews reported a perceived high density of mosquitoes in houses with livestock compared to houses without livestock.

conclusionDespite the potential for zooprophylaxis, this study indicates a higher malaria transmission risk in livestock-keeping communities. It is crucial to prioritize and implement targeted interventions to control vector populations within these communities. Furthermore, it is important to enhance community education and awareness regarding covariates such as livestock that influence malaria transmission.

Indexed as

AnophelesLivestockMalariaMosquito VectorsRural PopulationAdultAnimal HusbandryAnimalsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInsect Bites and StingsLongitudinal StudiesMaleTanzaniaBlood mealCommunity perspectiveLivestock managementMalaria transmissionMosquito biting riskZoopotentiationZooprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID39020392
PMCPMC11253484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.