Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39020229›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2024

Effect of Clinician Posture on Patient Perceptions of Communication in the Inpatient Setting: A Systematic Review.

Nathan Houchens, Jason M Engle, Rita Palanjian, Sanjay Saint, Whitney A Townsend, Mariam Nasrallah, Ashwin Gupta

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan HouchensMedicine Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. nathanho@med.umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-0711
Jason M EngleDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rita PalanjianUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sanjay SaintMedicine Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Whitney A TownsendUniversity of Michigan Taubman Health Sciences Library, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mariam NasrallahUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ashwin GuptaMedicine Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonverbal communication plays a pivotal role in the provision of effective patient care and has been associated with important patient health outcomes. Clinician posture, a nonverbal form of communication, may influence the patient experience and satisfaction. The relationship between clinician posture (i.e., standing or at the patient's eye level) and patient perceptions of clinician communication in the hospital-a setting with heightened power dynamics between patient and clinician-is currently unknown.

methodsWe conducted searches of Ovid MEDLINE, EBSCO CINAHL Complete, EBSCO PsycInfo, Elsevier Embase/Embase Classic, Elsevier Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection up to May 2023. English language studies were included if they compared clinician posture (eye-level or standing) during adult inpatient (including emergency department) interactions. Two authors independently abstracted data from included studies and assessed risk of bias or quality of evidence. A third author arbitrated any disagreements. Studies reported adherence to the posture intervention and/or patient perception outcomes. The latter included encounter duration, preferences for posture type, perceptions of interaction quality and clinician communication and compassion, and standardized assessments of patient satisfaction.

resultsFourteen studies (six randomized controlled trials, four quasi-experimental studies, four observational studies) assessed clinician posture at the bedside. Ten noted at least one favorable outcome for clinicians who communicated at the patient's eye level, three revealed no differences in patient perceptions between standing and sitting, and one noted higher patient ratings for standing clinicians. Findings were limited by variation in interventions and outcomes, generally high risk of bias, and relatively low adherence to assigned posture groups. DISCUSSION: Compared to standing, eye-level communication by clinicians appears beneficial. The magnitude and types of benefits clinicians and patients may gain from this behavior remain unclear given heterogeneity and generally high risk of bias in available studies. With its relatively easy implementation and potential for benefit, clinicians should consider communicating with their hospitalized patients at eye level. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42020199817.

Indexed as

InpatientsPhysician-Patient RelationsPostureCommunicationHumansNonverbal CommunicationPatient Satisfactionhospital medicinepatient experiencephysician postureprovider posturequality of caresitting vs standing

Identifiers

PMID39020229
PMCPMC11618274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.