Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39020162›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2025

Validation of a rodent model of episodic memory replay.

Cassandra L Sheridan, Danielle Panoz-Brown, Richard M Shiffrin, Jonathon D Crystal

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Rats replay episodic memories in context.Current biology : CB · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cassandra L SheridanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10TH St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Danielle Panoz-BrownDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10TH St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Richard M ShiffrinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10TH St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Jonathon D CrystalDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10TH St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. jcrystal@indiana.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation NSF/BCS-1946039National Science Foundation NSF/DBI-2050311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vivid episodic memories in humans have been described as the replay of the flow of past events in sequential order. Recently, Panoz-Brown et al. Current Biology, 28, 1628-1634, (2018) developed an olfactory memory task in which rats were presented with a list of trial-unique odors in an encoding context; next, in a distinctive memory assessment context, the rats were rewarded for choosing the second to last item from the list while avoiding other items from the list. In a different memory assessment context, the fourth to last item was rewarded. According to the episodic memory replay hypothesis, the rat remembers the list items and searches these items to find the item at the targeted locations in the list. However, events presented sequentially differ in memory trace strength, allowing a rat to use the relative familiarity of the memory traces, instead of episodic memory replay, to solve the task. Here, we directly manipulated memory trace strength by manipulating the odor intensity of target odors in both the list presentation and memory assessment. The rats relied on episodic memory replay to solve the memory assessment in conditions in which reliance on memory trace strength is ruled out. We conclude that rats are able to replay episodic memories.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicMental RecallOlfactory PerceptionAnimalsMaleModels, AnimalOdorantsRatsRats, Long-EvansRecognition, PsychologyRewardEpisodic memoryFamiliarityMemory trace strengthOlfactionRatReplay

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.