Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39020159›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Policy Learning for Actively Labeled Sample Selection on Lumbar Semi-supervised Classification.

Jinjin Hai, Jian Chen, Kai Qiao, Zhihai Su, Hai Lu, Bin Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jinjin HaiHenan Key Laboratory of Imaging and Intelligent Processing, PLA Strategic Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jian ChenHenan Key Laboratory of Imaging and Intelligent Processing, PLA Strategic Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, China.
Kai QiaoHenan Key Laboratory of Imaging and Intelligent Processing, PLA Strategic Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhihai SuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Hai LuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China. lvhai@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Bin YanHenan Key Laboratory of Imaging and Intelligent Processing, PLA Strategic Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, China. ybspace@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large labeled data bring significant performance improvement, but acquiring labeled medical data is particularly challenging due to the laborious, time-consuming, and medically qualified annotation. Semi-supervised learning has been employed to leverage unlabeled data. However, the quality and quantity of annotated data have a great influence on the performance of the semi-supervised model. Selecting informative samples through active learning is crucial and could improve model performance. Therefore, we propose a unified semi-supervised active learning architecture (RL-based SSAL) that alternately trains a semi-supervised network and performs active sample selection. Semi-supervised model is first well trained for sample selection, and selected label-required samples are annotated and added to the previously labeled dataset for subsequent semi-supervised model training. To learn to select the most informative samples, we adopt a policy learning-based approach that treats sample selection as a decision-making process. A novel reward function based on the product of predictive confidence and uncertainty is designed, aiming to select samples with high confidence and uncertainty. Comparisons with a semi-supervised baseline on collected lumbar disc herniation dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed RL-based SSAL, achieving over 3% promotion across different amounts of labeled data. Comparisons with other active learning methods and ablation studies reveal the superiority of proposed policy learning based on active sample selection and reward function. Our model trained with only 200 labeled data achieves an accuracy of 89.32% which is comparable to the performance achieved with the entire labeled dataset, demonstrating its significant advantage.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingSupervised Machine LearningHumansActive learningPolicy learningReward functionSemi-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39020159
PMCPMC11811330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.