Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39020158›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Enhanced Domain Adaptation for Foot Ulcer Segmentation Through Mixing Self-Trained Weak Labels.

David Jozef Hresko, Peter Drotar, Quoc Cuong Ngo, Dinesh Kant Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Jozef HreskoIISLab, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 1/9, Kosice, 04200, Kosicky Kraj, Slovakia.
Peter Drotar *IISLab, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 1/9, Kosice, 04200, Kosicky Kraj, Slovakia. peter.drotar@tuke.sk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-4696
Quoc Cuong Ngo *School of Engineering, RMIT University, 80/445 Swanston St, Melbourne, 3000, VIC, Australia.
Dinesh Kant Kumar *School of Engineering, RMIT University, 80/445 Swanston St, Melbourne, 3000, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound management requires the measurement of the wound parameters such as its shape and area. However, computerized analysis of the wound suffers the challenge of inexact segmentation of the wound images due to limited or inaccurate labels. It is a common scenario that the source domain provides an abundance of labeled data, while the target domain provides only limited labels. To overcome this, we propose a novel approach that combines self-training learning and mixup augmentation. The neural network is trained on the source domain to generate weak labels on the target domain via the self-training process. In the second stage, generated labels are mixed up with labels from the source domain to retrain the neural network and enhance generalization across diverse datasets. The efficacy of our approach was evaluated using the DFUC 2022, FUSeg, and RMIT datasets, demonstrating substantial improvements in segmentation accuracy and robustness across different data distributions. Specifically, in single-domain experiments, segmentation on the DFUC 2022 dataset scored a dice score of 0.711, while the score on the FUSeg dataset achieved 0.859. For domain adaptation, when these datasets were used as target datasets, the dice scores were 0.714 for DFUC 2022 and 0.561 for FUSeg.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerHumansDiabetic foot ulcerDomain adaptationMedical image segmentationMixup augmentationSelf-trainingSemi-supervised learningWeak label

Identifiers

PMID39020158
PMCPMC11810871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.