ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Fully and Weakly Supervised Deep Learning for Meniscal Injury Classification, and Location Based on MRI.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meniscal injury is a common cause of knee joint pain and a precursor to knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The purpose of this study is to develop an automatic pipeline for meniscal injury classification and localization using fully and weakly supervised networks based on MRI images. In this retrospective study, data were from the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI). The MR images were reconstructed using a sagittal intermediate-weighted fat-suppressed turbo spin-echo sequence. (1) We used 130 knees from the OAI to develop the LGSA-UNet model which fuses the features of adjacent slices and adjusts the blocks in Siam to enable the central slice to obtain rich contextual information. (2) One thousand seven hundred and fifty-six knees from the OAI were included to establish segmentation and classification models. The segmentation model achieved a DICE coefficient ranging from 0.84 to 0.93. The AUC values ranged from 0.85 to 0.95 in the binary models. The accuracy for the three types of menisci (normal, tear, and maceration) ranged from 0.60 to 0.88. Furthermore, 206 knees from the orthopedic hospital were used as an external validation data set to evaluate the performance of the model. The segmentation and classification models still performed well on the external validation set. To compare the diagnostic performances between the deep learning (DL) models and radiologists, the external validation sets were sent to two radiologists. The binary classification model outperformed the diagnostic performance of the junior radiologist (0.82-0.87 versus 0.74-0.88). This study highlights the potential of DL in knee meniscus segmentation and injury classification which can help improve diagnostic efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.