ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Balancing Performance and Interpretability in Medical Image Analysis: Case study of Osteopenia.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple studies within the medical field have highlighted the remarkable effectiveness of using convolutional neural networks for predicting medical conditions, sometimes even surpassing that of medical professionals. Despite their great performance, convolutional neural networks operate as black boxes, potentially arriving at correct conclusions for incorrect reasons or areas of focus. Our work explores the possibility of mitigating this phenomenon by identifying and occluding confounding variables within images. Specifically, we focused on the prediction of osteopenia, a serious medical condition, using the publicly available GRAZPEDWRI-DX dataset. After detection of the confounding variables in the dataset, we generated masks that occlude regions of images associated with those variables. By doing so, models were forced to focus on different parts of the images for classification. Model evaluation using F1-score, precision, and recall showed that models trained on non-occluded images typically outperformed models trained on occluded images. However, a test where radiologists had to choose a model based on the focused regions extracted by the GRAD-CAM method showcased different outcomes. The radiologists' preference shifted towards models trained on the occluded images. These results suggest that while occluding confounding variables may degrade model performance, it enhances interpretability, providing more reliable insights into the reasoning behind predictions. The code to repeat our experiment is available on the following link: https://github.com/mikulicmateo/osteopenia .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.