Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39020136›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

The epidemiology of odontoid fractures: a study from the Swedish fracture register.

Dawid Baranto, Julia Steinke, Simon Blixt, Paul Gerdhem, Joel Beck, Olof Westin, Alexandra Horvath

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dawid BarantoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Julia SteinkeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Simon BlixtDepartment of Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9549-2375
Paul GerdhemDepartment of Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8061-7163
Joel BeckDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Olof WestinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8416-8905
Alexandra HorvathDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. alexandra.horvath@gu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-2046-6337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study is to characterize the occurrence of odontoid fractures within a Swedish population.

methodsProspective data of adults diagnosed with an odontoid fracture between 2015 and 2021 were retrieved from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR). Epidemiologic data including age, sex, injury mechanism, injury type, fracture type (Anderson and D'Alonzo classification), neurological status and treatment type were requested from the SFR. Data pertinent to osteoporosis was retrieved from the Swedish National Patient Register.

resultsA total of 1,154 odontoid fractures were identified, of which 30 were type I fractures, 583 type II fractures, and 541 type III fractures. The mean (Standard Deviation [SD]) age was 77.2 (13.8) years. The prevalence of osteoporosis and neurological deficits did not differ between the fracture types. The majority of patients were treated non-surgically (81%). Male sex and patient age 18-30 years were commonly associated with a high-injury mechanism, especially motor vehicle accidents. In the type II fracture group, significantly more patients had fallen from standing height or less than in the type III group (66% vs. 58%, p = 0.01) while in contrast, motor vehicle accidents were more common in the type III fracture group (12% vs. type II: 8%, p = 0.04).

conclusionBased on the SFR, the typical odontoid fracture patient is older and suffers a type II fracture. Most injuries were caused by low-energy trauma although in younger patients and males, they were associated with motor vehicle accidents. Across the patient population, odontoid fractures were usually treated non-surgically.

Indexed as

Odontoid ProcessRegistriesSpinal FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesSwedenYoung AdultC2 fractureCervical spineDens axis fractureEpidemiologyOdontoid fractureThe Swedish Fracture Register

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.