ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the High-SMAS Facelift Technique: Objective Clinical Outcomes at 1-year.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Correction of the Nasolabial Fold: A Critical Review of Rhytidectomy Techniques.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Limited-Dissection Ligament-Preserving Facelift for Early Facial Aging: Surgical Technique and Clinical Experience.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe primary goal of the facelift is to rejuvenate the face without changing its natural features. This involves working on the deeper layers to preserve the surface look while adjusting the fat pads beneath. Thus, we often use a modified High-SMAS facelift method, following this deep-layer approach. The study evaluates whether the high-SMAS facelift, focusing on optimal repositioning, can effectively reduce aging signs in the mid to lower face and neck.
methodsConducted from 2018 to 2022, this retrospective cohort study included demographic data, relevant comorbidities, and operative details of patients undergoing lateral extended high-SMAS facial lifting, excluding revision cases. Complications were recorded, and a minimum one-year follow-up was ensured. The technique's effectiveness was assessed using pre- and one-year post-surgery images analyzed by three masked examiners with a validated scoring method by La Padula et al.
resultsThe study included 325 patients, with no major complications reported. Significant improvements were noted in post-operative High-SMAS visual scores compared to pre-operative scores (p < 0.0001), particularly in cheek fullness, jawline, and cervical angle definition.
conclusionsThe High-SMAS facelift technique, evaluated using the Face- and Neck-Lift Objective Photo-Numerical Assessment Scale, demonstrated significant cosmetic enhancements. This technique, focusing on optimal flap draping vectors, effectively restores a youthful appearance by improving facial contours. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39020030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.