ArticleNature ecology & evolution2024
Environmental memory alters the fitness effects of adaptive mutations in fluctuating environments.
Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deconstructing empirical fitness seascapes across scales of granularity.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Bayesian analysis of longitudinal RB-TnSeq resolves the fitness seascape in fluctuating environments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Deconstructing empirical fitness seascapes across scales of granularity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Putting BASIL in a BLT: A Bayesian filtering method for estimating the fitness effects of nascent adaptive mutations.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Parameter Evolvability in Gene Expression Models Drives Phenotypic Adaptation.ALIFE : proceedings of the artificial life conference. International Conference on Artificial Life · 2025Article
- How memory and adaptation cost shape cell phenotypic dynamics in response to fluctuating environments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- On the rate of aneuploidy reversion in a wild yeast model.Genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evolution in a static laboratory environment often proceeds via large-effect beneficial mutations that may become maladaptive in other environments. Conversely, natural settings require populations to endure environmental fluctuations. A sensible assumption is that the fitness of a lineage in a fluctuating environment is the time average of its fitness over the sequence of static conditions it encounters. However, transitions between conditions may pose entirely new challenges, which could cause deviations from this time average. To test this, we tracked hundreds of thousands of barcoded yeast lineages evolving in static and fluctuating conditions and subsequently isolated 900 mutants for pooled fitness assays in 15 environments. Here we find that fitness in fluctuating environments indeed often deviates from the time average, leading to fitness non-additivity. Moreover, closer examination reveals that fitness in one component of a fluctuating environment is often strongly influenced by the previous component. We show that this environmental memory is especially common for mutants with high variance in fitness across tested environments. We use a simple mathematical model and whole-genome sequencing to propose mechanisms underlying this effect, including lag time evolution and sensing mutations. Our results show that environmental fluctuations impact fitness and suggest that variance in static environments can explain these impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.