ArticleScientific reports2024
Prediction of protein secondary structure by the improved TCN-BiLSTM-MHA model with knowledge distillation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning architectures achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) accuracy in protein secondary structure prediction.Molecular diversity · 2026Review
- ConforFold recovers alternative protein conformations beyond MSA subsampling.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Combining knowledge distillation and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comprehensive assessment of AlphaFold's predictions of secondary structure and solvent accessibility at the amino acid-level in eukaryotic, bacterial and archaeal proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- A Hierarchical-Based Learning Approach for Multi-Action Intent Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Secondary structure prediction is a key step in understanding protein function and biological properties and is highly important in the fields of new drug development, disease treatment, bioengineering, etc. Accurately predicting the secondary structure of proteins helps to reveal how proteins are folded and how they function in cells. The application of deep learning models in protein structure prediction is particularly important because of their ability to process complex sequence information and extract meaningful patterns and features, thus significantly improving the accuracy and efficiency of prediction. In this study, a combined model integrating an improved temporal convolutional network (TCN), bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), and a multi-head attention (MHA) mechanism is proposed to enhance the accuracy of protein prediction in both eight-state and three-state structures. One-hot encoding features and word vector representations of physicochemical properties are incorporated. A significant emphasis is placed on knowledge distillation techniques utilizing the ProtT5 pretrained model, leading to performance improvements. The improved TCN, achieved through multiscale fusion and bidirectional operations, allows for better extraction of amino acid sequence features than traditional TCN models. The model demonstrated excellent prediction performance on multiple datasets. For the TS115, CB513 and PDB (2018-2020) datasets, the prediction accuracy of the eight-state structure of the six datasets in this paper reached 88.2%, 84.9%, and 95.3%, respectively, and the prediction accuracy of the three-state structure reached 91.3%, 90.3%, and 96.8%, respectively. This study not only improves the accuracy of protein secondary structure prediction but also provides an important tool for understanding protein structure and function, which is particularly applicable to resource-constrained contexts and provides a valuable tool for understanding protein structure and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.