ArticleScientific reports2024
An imbalanced learning method based on graph tran-smote for fraud detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Title: Multimodal Fusion of Clinical and Imaging Data for Early Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Internet fraud transaction detection based on temporal-aware heterogeneous graph oversampling and attention fusion network.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fraud seriously threatens individual interests and social stability, so fraud detection has attracted much attention in recent years. In scenarios such as social media, fraudsters typically hide among numerous benign users, constituting only a small minority and often forming "small gangs". Due to the scarcity of fraudsters, the conventional graph neural network might overlook or obscure critical fraud information, leading to insufficient representation of fraud characteristics. To address these issues, the tran-smote on graphs (GTS) method for fraud detection is proposed by this study. Structural features of each type of node are deeply mined using a subgraph neural network extractor, these features are integrated with attribute features using transformer technology, and the node's information representation is enriched, thereby addressing the issue of inadequate feature representation. Additionally, this approach involves setting a feature embedding space to generate new nodes representing minority classes, and an edge generator is used to provide relevant connection information for these new nodes, alleviating the class imbalance problem. The results from experiments on two real datasets demonstrate that the proposed GTS, performs better than the current state-of-the-art baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.