Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39019937›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Finite element models with automatic computed tomography bone segmentation for failure load computation.

Emile Saillard, Marc Gardegaront, Aurélie Levillain, François Bermond, David Mitton, Jean-Baptiste Pialat, Cyrille Confavreux, Thomas Grenier, Hélène Follet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of digital wire loop space maintainers for missing deciduous teeth].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emile SaillardINSERM, LYOS UMR 1033, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008, Lyon, France.
Marc GardegarontINSERM, LYOS UMR 1033, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008, Lyon, France.
Aurélie LevillainUniv Eiffel, LBMC UMRT9406, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69622, Lyon, France.
François BermondUniv Eiffel, LBMC UMRT9406, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69622, Lyon, France.
David MittonUniv Eiffel, LBMC UMRT9406, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69622, Lyon, France.
Jean-Baptiste PialatINSA-Lyon, CREATIS UMR5220, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Cyrille ConfavreuxINSERM, LYOS UMR 1033, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008, Lyon, France.
Thomas Grenier *INSA-Lyon, CREATIS UMR5220, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Hélène Follet *INSERM, LYOS UMR 1033, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008, Lyon, France. helene.follet@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-3290-2899

Funding

LabEx Primes, France ANR-11-LABX-0063MSDAVENIR Research Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone segmentation is an important step to perform biomechanical failure load simulations on in-vivo CT data of patients with bone metastasis, as it is a mandatory operation to obtain meshes needed for numerical simulations. Segmentation can be a tedious and time consuming task when done manually, and expert segmentations are subject to intra- and inter-operator variability. Deep learning methods are increasingly employed to automatically carry out image segmentation tasks. These networks usually need to be trained on a large image dataset along with the manual segmentations to maximize generalization to new images, but it is not always possible to have access to a multitude of CT-scans with the associated ground truth. It then becomes necessary to use training techniques to make the best use of the limited available data. In this paper, we propose a dedicated pipeline of preprocessing, deep learning based segmentation method and post-processing for in-vivo human femurs and vertebrae segmentation from CT-scans volumes. We experimented with three U-Net architectures and showed that out-of-the-box models enable automatic and high-quality volume segmentation if carefully trained. We compared the failure load simulation results obtained on femurs and vertebrae using either automatic or manual segmentations and studied the sensitivity of the simulations on small variations of the automatic segmentation. The failure loads obtained using automatic segmentations were comparable to those obtained using manual expert segmentations for all the femurs and vertebrae tested, demonstrating the effectiveness of the automated segmentation approach for failure load simulations.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFinite Element AnalysisTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomechanical PhenomenaBone and BonesComputer SimulationFemurHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSpine

Identifiers

PMID39019937
PMCPMC11255209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.