Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39019636›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Randomised controlled trial of an online mental health and suicide gatekeeper resource for parents and caregivers: study protocol.

Alison L Calear, Sonia M McCallum, Dominique Kazan, Michelle Torok, Aliza Werner-Seidler, Bridianne O'Dea, Alyssa Morse, Louise Farrer, Fiona Shand, Philip J Batterham

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia Alison.Calear@anu.edu.au.
Sonia M McCallumCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5421-8572
Dominique KazanCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Michelle TorokBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3741-8075
Aliza Werner-SeidlerBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9046-6159
Bridianne O'DeaBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1731-210X
Alyssa MorseCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Louise FarrerCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Fiona ShandBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4547-6876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRates of help-seeking for mental disorders and suicide are low among children and adolescents. Parents are viewed as gatekeepers for their care, yet they may lack the knowledge and skills to identify needs or facilitate service access. The primary aim is to test the effect of a new gatekeeper resource for parents and caregivers on their self-efficacy to recognise, respond and access support for mental health problems and suicide risk in their child. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-arm randomised controlled trial will compare an online mental health and suicide gatekeeper resource for parents and caregivers to a waitlist control. Australian parents of children aged 5-17 years recruited through social media and community advertising will participate in an online trial. Participants randomised to the intervention condition will be emailed the resource to work through at their own pace. The resource consists of three sections providing parents and caregivers with confidence, knowledge and skills to recognise and respond to mental health problems and suicide risk in their child, as well as support them in accessing professional help. The primary outcome measure is self-efficacy to recognise, respond and provide support for mental health problems and suicide risk, while secondary outcomes include perceived knowledge, stigma, literacy, help-seeking attitudes, intentions and barriers. Data will be collected at preintervention, postintervention (4 weeks after accessing the resource) and 12-week follow-up. Primary analyses will compare changes in self-efficacy in the intervention condition relative to the waitlist control using mixed-model repeated measures analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ethical aspects of the study were approved by the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee (Protocol 2023/195). If effective, the resource will fill an important gap in resources for parents, with the potential for dissemination through school groups, community organisations and clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12623000933651.

Indexed as

CaregiversParentsSelf EfficacyAdolescentAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHelp-Seeking BehaviorHumansInternetMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdolescentsCaregiversChildMENTAL HEALTHRandomized Controlled TrialSuicide & self-harm

Identifiers

PMID39019636
PMCPMC11256068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.