ArticleBMJ open quality2024
Effectiveness of Rapid Response Team implementation in a tertiary hospital in Egypt: an interventional study.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of a Rapid Response System in a University Hospital: Impact on In-Hospital Mortality and Surgical Patient Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Rapid response teams for new leaders: a narrative review of global evidence and implementation strategies with a focus on Japan.BMJ open quality · 2026Review
- Setting the Next Vital Sign Observation Interval as a Learning Objective in Simulation-Based Nursing Education: A Prospective Exploratory Observational Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Rapid Response Teams in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Critical care science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid response teams (RRTs) help in the early recognition of deteriorating patients in hospital wards and provide the needed management at the bedside by a qualified team. RRT implementation is still questionable because there is insufficient evidence regarding its effects. To date, according to our knowledge, no published studies have addressed the effectiveness of RRT implementation on inpatient care outcomes in Egypt.
objectiveWe aimed to assess the impact of an RRT on the rates of inpatient mortality, cardiopulmonary arrest calls and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in an Egyptian tertiary hospital.
methodsAn interventional study was conducted at a university hospital. Data was evaluated for 24 months before the intervention (January 2018 till December 2019, which included 4242 admissions). The intervention was implemented for 12 months (January 2021 till December 2021), ending with postintervention evaluation of 2338 admissions.
resultsRRT implementation was associated with a significant reduction in inpatient mortality rate from 88.93 to 46.44 deaths per 1000 discharges (relative risk reduction (RRR)=0.48; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.58). Inpatient cardiopulmonary arrest rate decreased from 7.41 to 1.77 calls per 1000 discharges (RRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.92), while unplanned ICU admissions decreased from 5.98 to 4.87 per 1000 discharges (RRR, 0.19; 95% CI, -0.65 to 0.60).
conclusionsRRT implementation was associated with a significantly reduced hospital inpatient mortality rate, cardiopulmonary arrest call rate as well as reduced unplanned ICU admission rate. Our results reveal that RRT can contribute to improving the quality of care in similar settings in developing countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.