Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39019546›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Legislation for advancing women's leadership in the health sector in India and Kenya: a 'law cube' approach to identify ways to strengthen legal environments for gender equality.

Mireille Evagora-Campbell, Sapna Kedia, Henry Owoko Odero, Radhika Uppal, Sally Atieno Odunga, Tusharika Mattoo, Patricia Blardony Miranda, Sonja Tanaka, Sylvia Kiwuwa-Muyingo, Ravi Verma and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mireille Evagora-CampbellGlobal Health 50/50, Cambridge, UK.
Sapna KediaInternational Center for Research on Women (ICRW), New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-1882
Henry Owoko OderoAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Radhika UppalInternational Center for Research on Women (ICRW), New Delhi, India.
Sally Atieno OdungaAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Tusharika MattooInternational Center for Research on Women (ICRW), New Delhi, India.
Patricia Blardony MirandaGlobal Health 50/50, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3872-5077
Sonja TanakaGlobal Health 50/50, Cambridge, UK.
Sylvia Kiwuwa-MuyingoAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ravi VermaInternational Center for Research on Women (ICRW), New Delhi, India.
Sarah HawkesGlobal Health 50/50, Cambridge, UK.
Kent BuseGlobal Health 50/50, Cambridge, UK kent.buse@globalhealth5050.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5485-0110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis paper examines the availability of legal provisions, or the lack thereof, that support women to progress equitably into leadership positions within the health workforce in India and Kenya.

methodsWe adapted the World Bank's

resultsSeveral legal domains are addressed inadequately or not at all, including pay in India, reproductive rights in Kenya and the care, family life and the work-life balance domain in both countries. Additionally, we found that among the Kenyan laws reviewed, few specify accountability mechanisms, and equity and human rights measures are mainly absent from the laws assessed in both countries. Our findings highlight inadequacies in the legal environments in India and Kenya may contribute to women's under-representation in leadership in the health sector. The absence of specified accountability mechanisms may impact the effective implementation of legislation, undermining their potential to promote equal opportunities.

conclusionsGovernment action is needed in both countries to ensure that legislation addresses best practice provisions, equity and human rights considerations, and provides for independent review mechanisms to ensure accountability for implementation of existing and future laws. This would contribute to ensuring that legal environments uphold the equality of opportunity necessary for realising gender justice in the workplace for the health workforce. PRIMARY SOURCE OF

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-031372).

Indexed as

Gender EquityLeadershipFemaleHumansIndiaKenyaWomen's RightsWorkplaceAccountabilityDecision MakingGlobal HealthHealth policies and all other topicsKenya

Identifiers

PMID39019546
PMCPMC11256037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.