Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39019545›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Pathways to leadership: what accounts for women's (in)equitable career paths in the health sectors in India and Kenya? A scoping review.

Naomi M Saville, Radhika Uppal, Sally Atieno Odunga, Sapna Kedia, Henry Owoko Odero, Sonja Tanaka, Sylvia Kiwuwa-Muyingo, Lawrence Eleh, Sucharitha Venkatesh, Zahra Zeinali and 4 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Naomi M SavilleInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK n.saville@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1735-3684
Radhika UppalICRW, New Delhi, India.
Sally Atieno OdungaAPHRC, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sapna KediaICRW, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-1882
Henry Owoko OderoAPHRC, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sonja TanakaGlobal Health 50/50, Cambridge, UK.
Sylvia Kiwuwa-MuyingoAPHRC, Nairobi, Kenya.
Lawrence ElehGlobal Health 50/50, Cambridge, UK.
Sucharitha VenkateshICRW, New Delhi, India.
Zahra ZeinaliGlobal Health 50/50, Cambridge, UK.
Aaron KoayGlobal Health 50/50, Cambridge, UK.
Kent BuseGlobal Health 50/50, Cambridge, UK.
Ravi VermaICRW, New Delhi, India.
Sarah HawkesGlobal Health 50/50, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to capture evidence on enablers and barriers to improving equal opportunity and effective organisational interventions that can advance women's leadership in India and Kenya's health sectors.

methodsWe systematically searched JSTOR, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases, reference lists of selected articles and Google Scholar using string searches. We included studies that were published in English from 2000 to 2022 in peer-reviewed journals or grey literature, focused on paid, formal health professionals in India or Kenya, described factors relating to women's representation/leadership.

resultsWe identified 26 studies, 15 from India and 11 from Kenya. From each country, seven studies focused on nursing. Participants included women and men health sector workers. Seven studies used mixed methods, 11 were qualitative, 5 were quantitative and 3 were commentaries. Factors influencing women's career progression at individual/interpersonal levels included family support, personal attributes (knowledge/skills) and material resources. Factors at the organisational level included capacity strengthening, networking, organisational policies, gender quotas, work culture and relationships, flexibility, and work burden. Nursing studies identified verbal/sexual harassment and professional hierarchies as barriers to career progression. Structural barriers included a lack of infrastructure (training institutes and acceptable working environments). Normative themes included occupational segregation by gender (particularly in nursing), unpaid care work burden for women and gender norms. Studies of interventions to improve women's career progression and sex-disaggregated workforce data in India or Kenya were limited, especially on leadership within career pathways. The evidence focuses on enablers and barriers at work, rather than on organisations/systems to support women's leadership or address gender norms.

conclusionsWomen in India and Kenya's health sectors face multiple impediments in their careers, which impact their advancement to leadership. This calls for gender-transformative interventions to tackle discrimination/harassment, provide targeted training/mentorship, better parental leave/benefits, flexible/remote working, family/coworker support and equal-opportunity policies/legislation.

Indexed as

LeadershipCareer MobilityFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIndiaKenyaDecision MakingHealth policyHealth systemsIndiaKenya

Identifiers

PMID39019545
PMCPMC11261739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.