ReviewMolecules and cells2024
Unlocking biological mechanisms with integrative functional genomics approaches.
Review in Molecules and cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- ONT-only genome assembly of a Korean male individual using a semen sample.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Plant Regeneration: Influencing Factors, Regulatory Networks, and Epigenetic Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Molecular mechanisms and evolutionary adaptations of transporters for photosynthates and specialized metabolites in plants.Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- Parallel Genome-Wide CRISPR Screens Reveal SORL1 and ZFYVE19 as Sequential Host Determinants of Salmonella Infection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Advancing precision diagnosis in autism: Insights from large-scale genomic studies.Molecules and cells · 2025Review
- Exploring Microbial Dark Matter for the Discovery of Novel Natural Products: Characteristics, Abundance Challenges and Methods.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reverse genetics offers precise functional insights into genes through the targeted manipulation of gene expression followed by phenotypic assessment. While these approaches have proven effective in model organisms such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, large-scale genetic manipulations in human cells were historically unfeasible due to methodological limitations. However, recent advancements in functional genomics, particularly clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based screening technologies and next-generation sequencing platforms, have enabled pooled screening technologies that allow massively parallel, unbiased assessments of biological phenomena in human cells. This review provides a comprehensive overview of cutting-edge functional genomic screening technologies applicable to human cells, ranging from short hairpin RNA screens to modern CRISPR screens. Additionally, we explore the integration of CRISPR platforms with single-cell approaches to monitor gene expression, chromatin accessibility, epigenetic regulation, and chromatin architecture following genetic perturbations at the omics level. By offering an in-depth understanding of these genomic screening methods, this review aims to provide insights into more targeted and effective strategies for genomic research and personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.