Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39018768›Full record

ArticleHearing research2024

Neurocognitive outcomes in young adults with cochlear implants: The role of early language access and crossmodal plasticity.

Geo Kartheiser, Kayla Cormier, Don Bell-Souder, Matthew Dye, Anu Sharma

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geo KartheiserRochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Kayla CormierDepartment of Speech Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States of America.
Don Bell-SouderDepartment of Speech Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States of America.
Matthew DyeRochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Anu SharmaDepartment of Speech Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States of America. Electronic address: anu.sharma@colorado.edu.

Funding

Neurocognitive Plasticity in Young Deaf Adults: Effects of Cochlear Implantation and Sign Language ExposureR01DC016346 · NIDCD · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DYE, MATTHEW WILLIAM GEOFFREY, SHARMA, ANU · 2017 to 2021
$2.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many children with profound hearing loss have received cochlear implants (CI) to help restore some sense of hearing. There is, however, limited research on long-term neurocognitive outcomes in young adults who have grown up hearing through a CI. This study compared the cognitive outcomes of early-implanted (n = 20) and late-implanted (n = 21) young adult CI users, and typically hearing (TH) controls (n=56), all of whom were enrolled in college. Cognitive fluidity, nonverbal intelligence, and American Sign Language (ASL) comprehension were assessed, revealing no significant differences in cognition and nonverbal intelligence between the early and late-implanted groups. However, there was a difference in ASL comprehension, with the late-implanted group having significantly higher ASL comprehension. Although young adult CI users showed significantly lower scores in a working memory and processing speed task than TH age-matched controls, there were no significant differences in tasks involving executive function shifting, inhibitory control, and episodic memory between young adult CI and young adult TH participants. In an exploratory analysis of a subset of CI participants (n = 17) in whom we were able to examine crossmodal plasticity, we saw greater evidence of crossmodal recruitment from the visual system in late-implanted compared with early-implanted CI young adults. However, cortical visual evoked potential latency biomarkers of crossmodal plasticity were not correlated with cognitive measures or ASL comprehension. The results suggest that in the late-implanted CI users, early access to sign language may have served as a scaffold for appropriate cognitive development, while in the early-implanted group early access to oral language benefited cognitive development. Furthermore, our results suggest that the persistence of crossmodal neuroplasticity into adulthood does not necessarily impact cognitive development. In conclusion, early access to language - spoken or signed - may be important for cognitive development, with no observable effect of crossmodal plasticity on cognitive outcomes.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsCognitionComprehensionNeuronal PlasticityPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesAdolescentAdultAge FactorsCase-Control StudiesCorrection of Hearing ImpairmentExecutive FunctionFemaleHearingHumansMaleAge of implantationAmerican sign languageCochlear implantCognitionCrossmodal plasticityDeafHigh-density EEG

Identifiers

PMID39018768
PMCPMC11878232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.