Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39018557›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Accessible Ecosystem for Clinical Research (Federated Learning for Everyone): Development and Usability Study.

Ashkan Pirmani, Martijn Oldenhof, Liesbet M Peeters, Edward De Brouwer, Yves Moreau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashkan PirmaniESAT-STADIUS, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4549-1002
Martijn OldenhofESAT-STADIUS, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-3014
Liesbet M PeetersData Science Institute, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6066-3899
Edward De Brouwer *ESAT-STADIUS, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0608-0155
Yves Moreau *ESAT-STADIUS, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4647-6560

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integrity and reliability of clinical research outcomes rely heavily on access to vast amounts of data. However, the fragmented distribution of these data across multiple institutions, along with ethical and regulatory barriers, presents significant challenges to accessing relevant data. While federated learning offers a promising solution to leverage insights from fragmented data sets, its adoption faces hurdles due to implementation complexities, scalability issues, and inclusivity challenges.

objectiveThis paper introduces Federated Learning for Everyone (FL4E), an accessible framework facilitating multistakeholder collaboration in clinical research. It focuses on simplifying federated learning through an innovative ecosystem-based approach.

methodsThe "degree of federation" is a fundamental concept of FL4E, allowing for flexible integration of federated and centralized learning models. This feature provides a customizable solution by enabling users to choose the level of data decentralization based on specific health care settings or project needs, making federated learning more adaptable and efficient. By using an ecosystem-based collaborative learning strategy, FL4E encourages a comprehensive platform for managing real-world data, enhancing collaboration and knowledge sharing among its stakeholders.

resultsEvaluating FL4E's effectiveness using real-world health care data sets has highlighted its ecosystem-oriented and inclusive design. By applying hybrid models to 2 distinct analytical tasks-classification and survival analysis-within real-world settings, we have effectively measured the "degree of federation" across various contexts. These evaluations show that FL4E's hybrid models not only match the performance of fully federated models but also avoid the substantial overhead usually linked with these models. Achieving this balance greatly enhances collaborative initiatives and broadens the scope of analytical possibilities within the ecosystem.

conclusionsFL4E represents a significant step forward in collaborative clinical research by merging the benefits of centralized and federated learning. Its modular ecosystem-based design and the "degree of federation" feature make it an inclusive, customizable framework suitable for a wide array of clinical research scenarios, promising to revolutionize the field through improved collaboration and data use. Detailed implementation and analyses are available on the associated GitHub repository.

Indexed as

accessibleclinical researchdesign effectivenessecosystemfederated learningimplementationinclusiveinclusivityintegritymultistakeholder collaborationreal-world datareliability

Identifiers

PMID39018557
PMCPMC11292148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.