Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39018555›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Detection of Common Respiratory Infections, Including COVID-19, Using Consumer Wearable Devices in Health Care Workers: Prospective Model Validation Study.

Zeinab Esmaeilpour, Aravind Natarajan, Hao-Wei Su, Anthony Faranesh, Ciaran Friel, Theodoros P Zanos, Stefani D'Angelo, Conor Heneghan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zeinab EsmaeilpourGoogle LLC, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9295-6733
Aravind NatarajanGoogle LLC, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8077-2235
Hao-Wei SuGoogle LLC, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2831-002X
Anthony FaraneshGoogle LLC, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4268-2365
Ciaran FrielNorthwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9882-2851
Theodoros P ZanosNorthwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9204-9551
Stefani D'AngeloNorthwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3590-8284
Conor HeneghanGoogle LLC, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4147-1349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe early detection of respiratory infections could improve responses against outbreaks. Wearable devices can provide insights into health and well-being using longitudinal physiological signals.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the performance of a consumer wearable physiology-based respiratory infection detection algorithm in health care workers.

methodsIn this study, we evaluated the performance of a previously developed system to predict the presence of COVID-19 or other upper respiratory infections. The system generates real-time alerts using physiological signals recorded from a smartwatch. Resting heart rate, respiratory rate, and heart rate variability measured during the sleeping period were used for prediction. After baseline recordings, when participants received a notification from the system, they were required to undergo testing at a Northwell Health System site. Participants were asked to self-report any positive tests during the study. The accuracy of model prediction was evaluated using respiratory infection results (laboratory results or self-reports), and postnotification surveys were used to evaluate potential confounding factors.

resultsA total of 577 participants from Northwell Health in New York were enrolled in the study between January 6, 2022, and July 20, 2022. Of these, 470 successfully completed the study, 89 did not provide sufficient physiological data to receive any prediction from the model, and 18 dropped out. Out of the 470 participants who completed the study and wore the smartwatch as required for the 16-week study duration, the algorithm generated 665 positive alerts, of which 153 (23.0%) were not acted upon to undergo testing for respiratory viruses. Across the 512 instances of positive alerts that involved a respiratory viral panel test, 63 had confirmed respiratory infection results (ie, COVID-19 or other respiratory infections detected using a polymerase chain reaction or home test) and the remaining 449 had negative upper respiratory infection test results. Across all cases, the estimated false-positive rate based on predictions per day was 2%, and the positive-predictive value ranged from 4% to 10% in this specific population, with an observed incidence rate of 198 cases per week per 100,000. Detailed examination of questionnaires filled out after receiving a positive alert revealed that physical or emotional stress events, such as intense exercise, poor sleep, stress, and excessive alcohol consumption, could cause a false-positive result.

conclusionsThe real-time alerting system provides advance warning on respiratory viral infections as well as other physical or emotional stress events that could lead to physiological signal changes. This study showed the potential of wearables with embedded alerting systems to provide information on wellness measures.

Indexed as

algorithmCOVID-19COVID detectionemotional stresshealthhealth care workerinfectionphysical stressphysiologypredictionrespiratory infectionrespiratory virusrespiratory virus detectionwearablewearable devicewell-being

Identifiers

PMID39018555
PMCPMC11292157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.