Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2024
Oral Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir as Postexposure Prophylaxis for Covid-19.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05047601 (A PHASE 2/3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, DOUBLE-DUMMY, PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF 2 REGIMENS OF ORALLY ADMINISTERED PF 07321332/RITONAVIR IN PREVENTING SYMPTOMATIC SARS-COV-2 INFECTION IN ADULT HOUSEHOLD CONTACTS OF AN INDIVIDUAL WITH SYMPTOMATIC COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A phase 2/3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 regimens of orally administered pf 07321332/ritonavir in preventing symptomatic sars-cov-2 infection in adult household contacts of an individual with symptomatic covid-19
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetics, safety, and dose optimization of GST-HG171 in renal impairment: insights from physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Trial
- Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Dose Recommendations for Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Individuals with Mild to Moderate COVID-19 and Severe Renal Impairment.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Clinical trial simulation of antiviral drugs.Journal of virology · 2026Review
- Article
- A Phase 1 Multiple-Dose, Open-Label, Pharmacokinetic Study of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Healthy Lactating Women.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Antivirals Targeting Coronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase and Main Protease: From Mechanisms of Action to Outcomes in COVID-19 Clinical Trials.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Review
- Household Transmission of COVID-19 and Influenza During the Early Omicron Era: An Insurance Claims Database Study in Japan.Viruses · 2026Article
- Observational
- Impact of in-hospital SARS-CoV-2 infection on mortality and outcomes in patients admitted for heart failure: a nationwide analysis in Brazil.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence of potentially inappropriate use of antiviral therapy with simnotrelvir-ritonavir versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in hospitalised patients: a retrospective study in Beijing, China.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Article
- Household exposure, demographic and health characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort study in Northern France.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Homoharringtonine is highly effective against SARS-CoV-2: a potential first-line defense in future coronavirus epidemics.National science review · 2025Article
- Comparative effectiveness of antiviral treatment on household transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a retrospective cohort study using administrative data.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Development of an electrochemical sensor using molecularly imprinted polymers for the specific determination of the antiretroviral drug ritonavir.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- What's Hot This Year in Infectious Diseases Clinical Science.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Review
- CROI 2025: Acute and Postacute COVID-19.Topics in antiviral medicine · 2025Article
- COVID-19 Pandemic Waves and 2024-2025 Winter Season in Relation to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Amantadine.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir for COVID-19 Among Individuals at High Risk: A Modeling Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical trials of treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have not shown a significant benefit of postexposure prophylaxis.
methodsWe conducted a phase 2-3 double-blind trial to assess the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in asymptomatic, rapid antigen test-negative adults who had been exposed to a household contact with Covid-19 within 96 hours before randomization. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (300 mg of nirmatrelvir and 100 mg of ritonavir) every 12 hours for 5 days or for 10 days or matching placebo for 5 or 10 days. The primary end point was the development of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection, confirmed on reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) or rapid antigen testing, through 14 days in participants who had a negative RT-PCR test at baseline.
resultsA total of 2736 participants were randomly assigned to a trial group - 921 to the 5-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group, 917 to the 10-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group, and 898 to the placebo group. Symptomatic, confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection developed by day 14 in 2.6% of the participants in the 5-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group, 2.4% of those in the 10-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group, and 3.9% of those in the placebo group. In each nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group, the percentage of participants in whom symptomatic, confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection developed did not differ significantly from that in the placebo group, with risk reductions relative to placebo of 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], -16.7 to 57.8; P = 0.17) in the 5-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group and 35.5% (95% CI, -11.5 to 62.7; P = 0.12) in the 10-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group. The incidence of adverse events was similar across the trial groups, with dysgeusia being the most frequently reported adverse event (in 5.9% and 6.8% of the participants in the 5-day and 10-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir groups, respectively, and in 0.7% of those in the placebo group).
conclusionsIn this placebo-controlled trial, postexposure prophylaxis with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for 5 or 10 days did not significantly reduce the risk of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05047601.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.