ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024
The incremental design of a machine learning framework for medical records processing.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges in Identifying Heart Failure Diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record.Journal of cardiac failure - intersections · 2026Article
- A scoping review of human-AI collaboration patterns and task divisions in healthcare applications.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based automated segmentation and quantification of the dural sac cross-sectional area in lumbar spine MRI.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis work presents the development and evaluation of coordn8, a web-based application that streamlines fax processing in outpatient clinics using a "human-in-the-loop" machine learning framework. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the platform at reducing fax processing time and producing accurate machine learning inferences across the tasks of patient identification, document classification, spam classification, and duplicate document detection.
methodsWe deployed coordn8 in 11 outpatient clinics and conducted a time savings analysis by observing users and measuring fax processing event logs. We used statistical methods to evaluate the machine learning components across different datasets to show generalizability. We conducted a time series analysis to show variations in model performance as new clinics were onboarded and to demonstrate our approach to mitigating model drift.
resultsOur observation analysis showed a mean reduction in individual fax processing time by 147.5 s, while our event log analysis of over 7000 faxes reinforced this finding. Document classification produced an accuracy of 81.6%, patient identification produced an accuracy of 83.7%, spam classification produced an accuracy of 98.4%, and duplicate document detection produced a precision of 81.0%. Retraining document classification increased accuracy by 10.2%. DISCUSSION: coordn8 significantly decreased fax-processing time and produced accurate machine learning inferences. Our human-in-the-loop framework facilitated the collection of high-quality data necessary for model training. Expanding to new clinics correlated with performance decline, which was mitigated through model retraining.
conclusionOur framework for automating clinical tasks with machine learning offers a template for health systems looking to implement similar technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.