Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39018490›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Applying natural language processing to patient messages to identify depression concerns in cancer patients.

Marieke M van Buchem, Anne A H de Hond, Claudio Fanconi, Vaibhavi Shah, Max Schuessler, Ilse M J Kant, Ewout W Steyerberg, Tina Hernandez-Boussard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Large language models for identifying depression concerns in cancer patients.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marieke M van BuchemDepartment of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2917-0842
Anne A H de HondDepartment of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Claudio FanconiDepartment of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Vaibhavi ShahDepartment of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Max SchuesslerDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Ilse M J KantDepartment of Digital Health, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3584CX, The Netherlands.
Ewout W SteyerbergClinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation and Research Lab (CAIRELab), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333ZN, The Netherlands.
Tina Hernandez-BoussardDepartment of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6553-3455

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
Advancing Knowledge Discovery for Postoperative Pain ManagementR01LM013362 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HERNANDEZ-BOUSSARD, TINA · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Catharine van Tussenbroek FundNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health UL1TR003142NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142NIH HHS R01LM013362NIH HHS UL1TR003142NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013362Prins Bernhard Cultuur Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to explore and develop tools for early identification of depression concerns among cancer patients by leveraging the novel data source of messages sent through a secure patient portal. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed classifiers based on logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVMs), and 2 Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) models (original and Reddit-pretrained) on 6600 patient messages from a cancer center (2009-2022), annotated by a panel of healthcare professionals. Performance was compared using AUROC scores, and model fairness and explainability were examined. We also examined correlations between model predictions and depression diagnosis and treatment.

resultsBERT and RedditBERT attained AUROC scores of 0.88 and 0.86, respectively, compared to 0.79 for LR and 0.83 for SVM. BERT showed bigger differences in performance across sex, race, and ethnicity than RedditBERT. Patients who sent messages classified as concerning had a higher chance of receiving a depression diagnosis, a prescription for antidepressants, or a referral to the psycho-oncologist. Explanations from BERT and RedditBERT differed, with no clear preference from annotators. DISCUSSION: We show the potential of BERT and RedditBERT in identifying depression concerns in messages from cancer patients. Performance disparities across demographic groups highlight the need for careful consideration of potential biases. Further research is needed to address biases, evaluate real-world impacts, and ensure responsible integration into clinical settings.

conclusionThis work represents a significant methodological advancement in the early identification of depression concerns among cancer patients. Our work contributes to a route to reduce clinical burden while enhancing overall patient care, leveraging BERT-based models.

Indexed as

DepressionNatural Language ProcessingNeoplasmsSupport Vector MachineAdultFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Portalsmachine learningmental healthnatural language processingoncology

Identifiers

PMID39018490
PMCPMC11413442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.