Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39018328›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2024

Polygenic selection to a changing optimum under self-fertilisation.

Matthew Hartfield, Sylvain Glémin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Accessible, realistic genome simulation with selection using stdpopsim.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew HartfieldInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6941-0647
Sylvain GléminUniversité de Rennes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), ECOBIO (Ecosystèmes, Biodiversité, Evolution) - Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 6553, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many traits are polygenic, affected by multiple genetic variants throughout the genome. Selection acting on these traits involves co-ordinated allele-frequency changes at these underlying variants, and this process has been extensively studied in random-mating populations. Yet many species self-fertilise to some degree, which incurs changes to genetic diversity, recombination and genome segregation. These factors cumulatively influence how polygenic selection is realised in nature. Here, we use analytical modelling and stochastic simulations to investigate to what extent self-fertilisation affects polygenic adaptation to a new environment. Our analytical solutions show that while selfing can increase adaptation to an optimum, it incurs linkage disequilibrium that can slow down the initial spread of favoured mutations due to selection interference, and favours the fixation of alleles with opposing trait effects. Simulations show that while selection interference is present, high levels of selfing (at least 90%) aids adaptation to a new optimum, showing a higher long-term fitness. If mutations are pleiotropic then only a few major-effect variants fix along with many neutral hitchhikers, with a transient increase in linkage disequilibrium. These results show potential advantages to self-fertilisation when adapting to a new environment, and how the mating system affects the genetic composition of polygenic selection.

Indexed as

Linkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritanceSelection, GeneticSelf-FertilizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAllelesAnimalsComputer SimulationGene FrequencyGenetic VariationMutation

Identifiers

PMID39018328
PMCPMC11285946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.