Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39018297›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Improving prevention and early detection of sepsis among patient groups at risk: Introducing a model for a multimodal information campaign-The SepWiss study protocol.

Wiltrud Abels, Konrad Reinhart, Edmund Neugebauer, Elisa Wulkotte, Evjenia Toubekis, Silke Piedmont, Sebastian Born, Thorsten Rieck, Odette Wegwarth, Claudia Spies and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wiltrud AbelsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-5413-049X
Konrad ReinhartDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Edmund NeugebauerBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany.
Elisa WulkotteDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Immunization Unit, Robert Koch - Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Evjenia ToubekisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Silke PiedmontBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany.
Sebastian BornInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Thorsten RieckDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Immunization Unit, Robert Koch - Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Odette WegwarthDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Claudia SpiesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1062-0495
Peter SchlattmannInstitute for Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Daniel SchwarzkopfDepartment for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Carolin Fleischmann-StruzekInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection. Annually, sepsis leads to approx. 90.000 deaths in Germany. Risk factors include amongst others older age (>60), innate or acquired dysfunction of the immune system, and underlying chronic diseases of the lung, heart, liver, or kidneys. The manifestation of sepsis is a medical emergency, and patient outcomes depend on timely diagnosis and immediate treatment. In addition, vaccinations e.g., against pneumococci or influenza virus, are a highly effective public health tool to prevent the most common underlying infections that may lead to sepsis. However, a lack of public awareness for the relevance of vaccination and detecting sepsis as an emergency underlines the need for public health interventions that address these issues. SepWiss aims to evaluate the effects of a multimodal information campaign designed to address this lack of awareness among the risk population in Germany.

methodsSepWiss is an intervention at state level, consisting of a multimodal information campaign targeting risk groups in the German federal states of Berlin and Brandenburg (intervention region). Based on available evidence, various information formats were developed and implemented by outdoor advertising, social media, educational formats and through stakeholders' platforms, starting in August 2021. The control region comprises of the remaining 14 German federal states. We will analyze vaccination coverage (primary outcome), and sepsis knowledge, the ability to detect sepsis as an emergency, and attitude towards vaccination (secondary outcomes) amongst the risk population in a controlled before-after comparison. The implementation is accompanied by a mixed-method process evaluation. DISCUSSION: SepWiss is the first project of its kind to evaluate a complex multi-faceted evidence-based information campaign with regards to the topics of vaccination coverage, and the importance of sepsis detection and prevention for the most vulnerable populations in Germany. Results will be valuable for informing further nationwide campaigns.

trial registrationGerman Registry for Clinical Trials: DRKS00024475. Registered February 24th, 2021.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisSepsisAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsVaccination

Identifiers

PMID39018297
PMCPMC11253930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.