Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39018167›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2024

Risk factors for breast cancer subtypes by race and ethnicity: a scoping review.

Amber N Hurson, Thomas U Ahearn, Hela Koka, Brittany D Jenkins, Alexandra R Harris, Sylvia Roberts, Sharon Fan, Jamirra Franklin, Gisela Butera, Renske Keeman and 11 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Harnessing the Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Amber N HursonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Thomas U AhearnDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Hela KokaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Brittany D JenkinsDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Alexandra R HarrisDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Sylvia RobertsDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Sharon FanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Jamirra FranklinLaboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Gisela ButeraNational Institutes of Health Library, Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Renske KeemanDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Audrey Y JungDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Pooja MiddhaDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gretchen L GierachDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Xiaohong R YangDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4451-8664
Jenny Chang-ClaudeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Rulla M TamimiDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Melissa A TroesterDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Elisa V BanderaSection of Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Mustapha AbubakarDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Marjanka K SchmidtDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Montserrat Garcia-ClosasDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1033-2650

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI PANOS G. GEORGOPOULOS · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Breast Cancer NowCancer Prevention Fellowship ProgramEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation 633784Institute of Cancer ResearchNCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer consists of distinct molecular subtypes. Studies have reported differences in risk factor associations with breast cancer subtypes, especially by tumor estrogen receptor (ER) status, but their consistency across racial and ethnic populations has not been comprehensively evaluated.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative, scoping literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis, extension for Scoping Reviews to investigate consistencies in associations between 18 breast cancer risk factors (reproductive, anthropometric, lifestyle, and medical history) and risk of ER-defined subtypes in women who self-identify as Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latina, or White. We reviewed publications between January 1, 1990 and July 1, 2022. Etiologic heterogeneity evidence (convincing, suggestive, none, or inconclusive) was determined by expert consensus.

resultsPublications per risk factor ranged from 14 (benign breast disease history) to 66 (parity). Publications were most abundant for White women, followed by Asian, Black or African American, and Hispanic or Latina women. Etiologic heterogeneity evidence was strongest for parity, followed by age at first birth, postmenopausal body mass index, oral contraceptive use, and estrogen-only and combined menopausal hormone therapy. Evidence was limited for other risk factors. Findings were consistent across racial and ethnic groups, although the strength of evidence varied.

conclusionThe literature supports etiologic heterogeneity by ER for some established risk factors that are consistent across race and ethnicity groups. However, in non-White populations evidence is limited. Larger, more comparable data in diverse populations are needed to better characterize breast cancer etiologic heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEthnicityFemaleHumansRacial GroupsReceptors, EstrogenRisk FactorsReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID39018167
PMCPMC11630539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.