ReviewCancer immunology research2024
Regulatory Considerations for Genome-Edited T-cell Therapies.
Review in Cancer immunology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Emerging strategies to reduce the side effects of CAR-T cell therapy: focusing on gene editing and nanotechnology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- DNA and RNA editing for the therapy of human diseases: current status, challenges, and future prospects.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Perspective of smart nanocapsule swallowable laser-guided for integrated sensing and crispr-mediated cancer gene editing.Cancer gene therapy · 2026Review
- Multi-omic profiling and preclinical efficacy of fratricide-driven, unedited CD7 CAR-T cells in T-cell leukemia.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Multiplex engineering and multifunction T cells for precise and effective immunotherapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- From bench to bedside: translating mesenchymal stem cell therapies through preclinical and clinical evidence.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methods to engineer the genomes of human cells for therapeutic intervention continue to advance at a remarkable pace. Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T lymphocytes have pioneered the way for these therapies, initially beginning with insertions of chimeric antigen receptor transgenes into T-cell genomes using classical gene therapy vectors. The broad use of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based technologies to edit endogenous genes has now opened the door to a new era of precision medicine. To add complexity, many engineered cellular therapies under development integrate gene therapy with genome editing to introduce novel biological functions and enhance therapeutic efficacy. Here, we review the current state of scientific, translational, and regulatory oversight of gene-edited cell products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.