Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39018092›Full record

ArticleJMIR nursing2024

Digital Health Education and Training for Undergraduate and Graduate Nursing Students: Scoping Review.

Manal Kleib, Antonia Arnaert, Lynn M Nagle, Shamsa Ali, Sobia Idrees, Daniel da Costa, Megan Kennedy, Elizabeth Mirekuwaa Darko

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  19. Scoping review of oncology clinical trials nursing: Roles, competencies, and evolving practice in cancer research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manal KleibFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4680-6750
Antonia ArnaertIngram School of Nursing McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8086-7058
Lynn M NagleFaculty of Nursing, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4129-7117
Shamsa AliFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-8427
Sobia IdreesFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4451-4359
Daniel da CostaIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7971-6287
Megan KennedyGeoffrey & Robyn Sperber Health Sciences Library,, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2337-6441
Elizabeth Mirekuwaa DarkoFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1394-3641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs technology will continue to play a pivotal role in modern-day health care and given the potential impact on the nursing profession, it is vitally important to examine the types and features of digital health education in nursing so that graduates are better equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills needed to provide safe and quality nursing care and to keep abreast of the rapidly evolving technological revolution.

objectiveIn this scoping review, we aimed to examine and report on available evidence about digital health education and training interventions for nursing students at the undergraduate and graduate levels.

methodsThis scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). A comprehensive search strategy was developed and applied to identified bibliographic databases including MEDLINE (Ovid; 1946 to present), Embase (Ovid; 1974 to present), CINAHL (EBSCOhost; 1936 to present), ERIC (EBSCOhost; 1966 to present), Education Research Complete (EBSCOhost; inception to present), and Scopus (1976 to present). The initial search was conducted on March 3, 2022, and updated searches were completed on January 11, 2023, and October 31, 2023. For gray literature sources, the websites of select professional organizations were searched to identify relevant digital health educational programs or courses available to support the health workforce development. Two reviewers screened and undertook the data extraction process. The review included studies focused on the digital health education of students at the undergraduate or graduate levels or both in a nursing program. Studies that discussed instructional strategies, delivery processes, pedagogical theory and frameworks, and evaluation strategies for digital health education; applied quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods; and were descriptive or discussion papers, with the exception of review studies, were included. Opinion pieces, editorials, and conference proceedings were excluded.

resultsA total of 100 records were included in this review. Of these, 94 records were identified from database searches, and 6 sources were identified from the gray literature. Despite improvements, there are significant gaps and limitations in the scope of digital health education at the undergraduate and graduate levels, consequently posing challenges for nursing students to develop competencies needed in modern-day nursing practice.

conclusionsThere is an urgent need to expand the understanding of digital health in the context of nursing education and practice and to better articulate its scope in nursing curricula and enforce its application across professional nursing practice roles at all levels and career trajectories. Further research is also needed to examine the impact of digital health education on improving patient outcomes, the quality of nursing care, and professional nursing role advancement. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.11124/JBIES-22-00266.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, GraduateStudents, NursingEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateHumanscurriculumdigital healthgraduatehealth informaticsnursing educationnursing studentsundergraduate

Identifiers

PMID39018092
PMCPMC11292154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.