ArticleMetabolic brain disease2024
Portosystemic Hepatic Encephalopathy Scores (PHES) differ between Danish and German healthy populations despite their geographical and cultural similarities.
Article in Metabolic brain disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of metabolic syndrome with minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Plasma Neurodegenerative Biomarkers for Diagnosing Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy and Predicting Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy in Chinese Patients with Hepatic Cirrhosis.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) is common in liver cirrhosis and is identified by psychometric tests. The portosystemic hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) is the most widely used and serves as an inter-study comparator. PHES has not been standardised for use in the Danish population, where German normal values have been applied until now based on the notion that the populations are comparable. This study aimed to evaluate if German PHES normal values can be applied in the Danish population and establish Danish normal values if needed. 200 Danish and 217 German healthy persons underwent Number Connection Test A and B (NCT), Line Tracing Test (LTT), Digit Symbol Test (DST), and Serial Dotting Test (SDT), and based on performance, PHES was calculated. German and Danish PHES performance declined with age in all subtests but more rapidly in Danes. Both German and Danish norms were impacted by gender and education, but to a different extent in the single tests of the test battery. Accordingly, there was a need for specific Danish normal values, which are presented here. Applying the new Danish normal values instead of the German in patients with cirrhosis yielded a lower percentage of out-of-norm performances (58% vs. 66%) and, hence, a lower prevalence of MHE. Danes and Germans perform differently on PHES, and therefore, normal German values cannot be used in Danish patients. Danish normal values are presented here and yield a lower number of 'out of norm' performances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.