ArticleClinical rheumatology2024
Lupus pregnancy outcomes in women with previous adverse outcomes: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Approaches to the Management of Rheumatic Diseases in Pregnancy: Risk Stratification, Therapeutic Advances, and Maternal-Fetal Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of systemic lupus erythematosus on the reproductive health of women before and after disease onset: an observational study.Rheumatology international · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe primary objective of this prospective cohort study was to assess the usefulness of a predefined multidisciplinary care pathway-based management on pregnancy outcome(s) in women with SLE who already had at least one adverse obstetric outcome(s).
methodsBetween March 2010 and March 2023, all consecutive, consenting women with SLE who already had at least one previous adverse obstetric outcome (preterm labour, pre-eclampsia, termination of pregnancy, miscarriage, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), intrauterine death (IUD) or stillbirth] were prospectively screened and counselled. The protocol comprised preconception and post-natal drug and disease status review, periodic ante-natal visits for the monitoring of pregnancy and drug and disease status review and post-natal drug and disease status review and contraception advice. Therapeutic changes were made as necessary at each visit.
resultsA total of 213 women were screened and 197 women (age, 28 ± 6.34 years) were enrolled who had 226 pregnancies. Previous poor obstetric outcomes were miscarriage(s), 186; termination of pregnancy, 4; preterm labour, 51; IUGR, 36; IUD or stillbirth, 16; low birth weight (LBW), 44 and pre-eclampsia, 4. Seventy-seven (39%) women had secondary APS and 37 (19%) had a history of lupus nephritis. There were 194/226 (86%) live births [40 LBW (18%); caesarean section in 101 (45%)]. Thirty pregnancies culminated in miscarriages and 2 in IUDs (14%). Sixty-eight patients (30%) experienced lupus flare during pregnancy (36 mild, 20 moderate and 8 severe).
conclusionOur experience underscores the usefulness of a predefined multidisciplinary care pathway-based management for improving pregnancy outcomes in women with SLE who had previous adverse outcomes. Key Points • In women with SLE who had previous adverse obstetric outcome(s) a risk of poor outcome in subsequent pregnancy remains. • Good pregnancy outcomes in these women could be achieved by predefined multidisciplinary care pathways focussed on addressing all relevant issues. • Improved access to rheumatology services and collaboration between rheumatologists and obstetricians is key to improving outcomes in SLE pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39017917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.