ArticleEndocrine2024
Relation between blood pressure time in range and composite cardiovascular outcomes in patients with primary aldosteronism: a retrospective case study.
Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the association between blood pressure (BP) time in range (TIR) and composite cardiovascular outcomes in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA).
methodsBetween January 2019 and December 2021, 47 patients with PA were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and cardiovascular outcomes were assessed in all patients during the first diagnosis of PA.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 48.8 ± 11.4 years. Compared to PA without composite cardiovascular outcomes, the nighttime systolic BP TIR [31.2% (6.2%, 81.2%) vs. 11.5% (0.0%, 29.7%), p = 0.02] and defined daily dose (DDDs) of antihypertensive medication [2.0 (1.0, 2.8) vs. 1.0 (1.0, 2.0), p = 0.03] were lower in PA patients with composite cardiovascular outcomes, while higher glucose (5.0 ± 1.0 mmol/L vs. 5.9 ± 1.5 mmol/L) and prevalence of a history of alcohol intake was higher in PA patients with composite cardiovascular outcomes. There were no differences in age, sex, BMI, smoking, duration of hypertension, lipid levels, aldosteronism, clinic BP, 24-hour mean BP, daytime or nighttime BP, percentage of nocturnal SBP or DBP decline, 24-hour BP TIR, daytime BP TIR, or nighttime DBP TIR between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, nighttime systolic BP TIR was significantly associated with composite cardiovascular outcomes (adjusted OR = 0.92 [95% CI 0.86, 0.99]) in multiple logistic regression analysis.
conclusionNighttime systolic BP TIR was significantly associated with composite cardiovascular outcomes in patients with PA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39017833What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.