Observational studyGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
In vitro protamine addition for coagulation assessment using TEG 6s system during cardiopulmonary bypass: a pilot study.
Observational study in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSystemic heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can significantly affect thromboelastography (TEG). This study investigated the feasibility of adding protamine in vitro to allow assessment of coagulation status using the TEG 6s system during CPB.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, 21 patients undergoing elective cardiac valve surgery were evaluated. During CPB, protamine was added in vitro to the heparinized blood of these patients at a concentration of 0.05 mg/mL and analyzed with the TEG 6s (Pre). The TEG parameters were compared to those analyzed after CPB withdrawal and systemic protamine administration (Post).
resultsThe citrated kaolin maximal amplitude (CK-MA) and the citrated functional fibrinogen maximal amplitude (CFF-MA) exhibited strong correlations between Pre and Post measurements (r = 0.790 and 0.974, respectively, P < 0.001 for both), despite significant mean differences (-2.23 mm for CK-MA and -0.68 mm for CFF-MA). Bland-Altman analysis showed a clinically acceptable agreement between Pre and Post measurement of CK-MA and CFF-MA (the percentage error was 10.6% and 12.2%, respectively). In contrast, the citrated kaolin reaction time (CK-R) showed no significant correlation between Pre and Post measurements (r = 0.328, P = 0.146), with a mean difference of 1.42 min (95% CI: -0.45 to 3.29).
conclusionsIn vitro protamine addition allows assessment of coagulation status during CPB using the TEG 6s system. CK-MA and CFF-MA measured during CPB using this method revealed a strong correlation and agreement with post-CPB measurements, suggesting that our method potentially facilitates early prediction of post-CPB coagulation status and decision-making on transfusion strategies. CLINICAL
trial registrationThe study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR, registration number: UMIN000041097, date of registration: July 13, 2020, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000046925 ) before the recruitment of participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39017825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.