ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2024
Purely Endoscopic Evacuation of Intracranial Hematomas.
Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral hemorrhage is a frequent disease and one of the main causes of disabilities. Even in the case of cerebral hemorrhage, if there were a treatment that would improve the functional prognosis, the benefits would be immeasurable. Although there are limited reports with a high level of evidence in past studies, it has been found that surgery can be effective if a large amount of hematoma can be removed in a minimally invasive manner. Also, it has become clear that the control of bleeding becomes a problem when surgery is performed within 2 days after the onset of stroke and that the therapeutic time window might be longer. In Japan, since the introduction of the transparent sheath by Nishihara et al., endoscopic hematoma removal has been widely performed and has become the standard surgical procedure. The three basic equipment needed for this surgery are a rigid scope, a suction coagulator, and a transparent sheath. The key point of the surgery is to search for hematomas and bleeding points through a transparent sheath and coagulate the bleeding vessels. In this chapter, we will introduce surgical techniques using these devices, but it is important to carefully decide on surgical options by considering your own technique, the condition of each patient, and the devices available in the area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39017790What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.