Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39017789›Full record

ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2024

Purely Endoscopic Treatment for Arachnoid Cysts.

Joachim Oertel, Karen Radtke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joachim OertelKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätklinikum des Saarlandes und Fakultät für Medizin, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Saar, Germany. Joachim.Oertel@uks.eu.
Karen RadtkeKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätklinikum des Saarlandes und Fakultät für Medizin, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Saar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arachnoid cysts are benign, mostly congenital lesions that are asymptomatic in most patients. In some cases, due to their location or sheer size, they produce a mass effect or hydrocephalic obstruction of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow and thus might warrant surgical treatment. The goal of the surgery is usually to reduce pressure inside the cysts, to reduce the mass effect, or to restore the CSF pathway. Surgical treatment options are resection, fenestration, or shunting of the cyst. Over the past decades, treatment under sheer endoscopic control either through a tube or via craniotomy of arachnoid cysts has been studied thoroughly and replaced open microsurgical cyst surgery in the opinion of many neurosurgeons. Endoscopic treatment has proven to be a safe and feasible technique for both patients and surgeons. In the following chapter, the authors describe their indications for surgery and pre- and postoperative workup, where precautions should be taken, and discuss the different possibilities and techniques of endoscopic cyst fenestration. The aim is to give detailed instructions and present cases for ventriculocystostomy, cystocisternostomy, ventriculocystocisternostomy, and cystoventriculostomy and point out specifics deemed to be important to avoid complications and to ensure the best possible outcome for each patient.

Indexed as

Arachnoid CystsNeuroendoscopyHumansVentriculostomyArachnoid cystsCystocisternostomyCystoventriculostomyETVNeuroendoscopyVentriculocystocisternostomyVentriculocystostomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.