Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39017786›Full record

ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2024

Endoport-Guided Endoscopic Excision of Intraaxial Brain Tumors.

Suresh K Sankhla, Anshu Warade, G M Khan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suresh K SankhlaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Global Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Anshu WaradeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Global Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
G M KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Global Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTranscortical approaches using a spatula-based retraction system have traditionally been used for the microsurgical resection of deep-seated intraventricular and parenchymal brain tumors. Recently, transparent cylindrical or tubular retractors have been developed to provide a stable corridor to access deeper brain lesions and perform bimanual microsurgical resection. The flexible endoports minimize brain retraction injury during surgery and, along with the superior vision of endoscopes, offer several advantages over standard microsurgery. In this chapter, we describe the surgical technique of the endoport-guided endoscopic excision of deep-seated intraaxial brain tumors.

methodsThe endoscopic endoport technique that we use at our institution for the surgical management of intraventricular and intraparenchymal brain tumors has been described in detail with illustrative cases.

resultsResults from the literature review of intraventricular and intraparenchymal port surgery were analyzed, and the feasibility and safety of this technique were discussed. Surgical complication avoidance and management were highlighted. The port technique offers numerous potential advantages, including (1) reducing focal brain injury by distributing retraction forces homogenously, (2) minimizing white matter disruption and the risk of fascicle injury during cannulation, (3) ensuring the stability of the surgical corridor during the procedure, (4) preventing inadvertent expansion of the corticectomy and white fiber tract dissection throughout surgery, and (5) protecting the surrounding tissues against iatrogenic injuries caused by instrument entry and reentry.

conclusionThe endoport-assisted endoscopic technique is safe and offers an effective alternative option for the resection of intraventricular and intraparenchymal lesions.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendoscopyNeurosurgical ProceduresBrain tumorsEndoportEndoscopeIntraventricularPort technique

Identifiers

PMID39017786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.