Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39017760›Full record

SynthesisLa Radiologia medica2024

Delta radiomics: an updated systematic review.

Valerio Nardone, Alfonso Reginelli, Dino Rubini, Federico Gagliardi, Sara Del Tufo, Maria Paola Belfiore, Luca Boldrini, Isacco Desideri, Salvatore Cappabianca

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in La Radiologia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Insights into pet-based radiogenomics in oncology: an updated systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Application of delta radiomics based on cone-beam computed tomography in predicting radiotherapy efficacy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Delta radiomics for predicting early radiation-induced lung injury after thoracic radiotherapy: a retrospective paired-CT study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Valerio NardoneDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy. Valerio.nardone@unicampania.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-0965
Alfonso ReginelliDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Dino RubiniDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Federico GagliardiDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Sara Del TufoDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Maria Paola BelfioreDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Luca BoldriniDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Isacco DesideriDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Salvatore CappabiancaDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiomics can provide quantitative features from medical imaging that can be correlated with various biological features and diverse clinical endpoints. Delta radiomics, on the other hand, consists in the analysis of feature variation at different acquisition time points, usually before and after therapy. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of the different delta radiomics approaches.

methodsEligible articles were searched in Embase, Pubmed, and ScienceDirect using a search string that included free text and/or Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) with 3 key search terms: 'radiomics,' 'texture,' and 'delta.' Studies were analyzed using QUADAS-2 and the RQS tool.

resultsForty-eight studies were finally included. The studies were divided into preclinical/methodological (5 studies, 10.4%); rectal cancer (6 studies, 12.5%); lung cancer (12 studies, 25%); sarcoma (5 studies, 10.4%); prostate cancer (3 studies, 6.3%), head and neck cancer (6 studies, 12.5%); gastrointestinal malignancies excluding rectum (7 studies, 14.6%) and other disease sites (4 studies, 8.3%). The median RQS of all studies was 25% (mean 21% ± 12%), with 13 studies (30.2%) achieving a quality score < 10% and 22 studies (51.2%) < 25%.

conclusionsDelta radiomics shows potential benefit for several clinical endpoints in oncology, such asdifferential diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of treatment response, evaluation of side effects. Nevertheless, the studies included in this systematic review suffer from the bias of overall low methodological rigor, so that the conclusions are currently heterogeneous, not robust and hardly replicable. Further research with prospective and multicenter studies is needed for the clinical validation of delta radiomics approaches.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsDiagnostic ImagingHumansRadiomicsDelta radiomicsMeta-analysisOncologyPrecision medicineRadiomicsRadiotherapyTexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID39017760
PMCPMC11322237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.