ArticleOdontology2025
Deep learning with convolution neural network detecting mesiodens on panoramic radiographs: comparing four models.
Article in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Explainable artificial intelligence in dental imaging: a systematic review of interpretability and the current state of trust evidence.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Radiographic localization of supernumerary teeth: a narrative review.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop an optimal, simple, and lightweight deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) model to detect the presence of mesiodens on panoramic radiographs. A total of 628 panoramic radiographs with and without mesiodens were used as training, validation, and test data. The training, validation, and test dataset were consisted of 218, 51, and 40 images with mesiodens and 203, 55, and 61 without mesiodens, respectively. Unclear panoramic radiographs for which the diagnosis could not be accurately determined and other modalities were required for the final diagnosis were retrospectively identified and employed as the training dataset. Four CNN models provided within software supporting the creation of neural network models for deep learning were modified and developed. The diagnostic performance of the CNNs was evaluated according to accuracy, precision, recall and F1 scores, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). In addition, we used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to attempt to visualize the image features that were important in the classifications of the model that exhibited the best diagnostic performance. A binary_connect_mnist_LeNet model exhibited the best performance of the four deep learning models. Our results suggest that a simple lightweight model is able to detect mesiodens. It is worth referring to AI-based diagnosis before an additional radiological examination when diagnosis of mesiodens cannot be made on unclear images. However, further revaluation by the specialist would be also necessary for careful consideration because children are more radiosensitive than adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39017730What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.