Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39017699›Full record

ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2024

[Complex optical systems for individualized correction of presbyopia].

Ramin Khoramnia, Tadas Naujokaitis, Grzegorz Łabuz, Gerd U Auffarth

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ramin KhoramniaUniversitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Ramin.Khoramnia@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6237-7773
Tadas NaujokaitisUniversitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Grzegorz ŁabuzUniversitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Gerd U AuffarthUniversitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multitude of available intraocular lens (IOL) models enable a personalized approach to presbyopia correction in order to meet each patient's needs. This review article discusses more complex approaches which can be useful in selected cases. The concept of reversible trifocality enables correction of presbyopia using a supplementary intraocular lens (IOL), which can be removed if necessary (e.g., intolerance to multifocal optics). The use of capsulotomy-fixated IOLs enables high precision for positioning of the lens and better stability compared to conventional capsular bag-fixated IOLs, which can be particularly advantageous in multifocal optics. The mix and match concept enables a combination of different IOLs with various optical principles to achieve the desired binocular effect. Binocular IOL systems, which consist of two complementary IOLs, can be seen as a further development of the mix and match concept. Knowledge of the available options and their application can further improve correction of presbyopia.

Indexed as

PresbyopiaHumansLenses, IntraocularLens Implantation, IntraocularPrecision MedicineProsthesis DesignFemtosecond laserIntraocular lensesMix and match conceptMultifocal opticsReversible trifocality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.